A systematic review of the measurement properties of aspects of psychological capacity in older adults

Author:

Oster Candice1,Hines Sonia2,Rissel Chris2,Asante Dennis2,Khadka Jyoti1,Seeher Katrin M3,Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan Jotheeswaran4,Mikton Christopher5,Diaz Theresa6,Isaac Vivian27

Affiliation:

1. Flinders University Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing & Health Sciences, , Adelaide , Australia

2. Flinders University College of Medicine & Public Health, Flinders Rural and Remote Health, , Alice Springs, Northern Territory , Australia

3. World Health Organization Brain Health Unit, Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, , Geneva , Switzerland

4. World Health Organization Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

5. World Health Organization Demographic Change and Healthy Ageing Unit, Social Determinants of Health, , Geneva , Switzerland

6. World Health Organization Epidemiology, Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child, Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

7. Charles Sturt University School of Allied Health, Exercise & Sports Sciences, Faculty of Science & Health, , Albury, New South Wales , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objective to examine the measurement properties of instruments that have been used to measure aspects of psychological capacity in adults aged 60 years and over. Methods the databases PsycINFO, MEDLINE, EMCARE and Scopus from 2010 were searched using search terms related to psychological capacity, older persons and measurement properties. Both data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were conducted using the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) criteria using Covidence software. Results the full text of 326 articles were reviewed and a total of 30 studies were included, plus two further articles identified from reference lists (n = 32). No single instrument measuring psychological capacity was identified. Twenty (n = 20) instruments were identified that measure seven constructs of psychological capacity: Resilience; Sense of coherence; Hope; Mindfulness; Optimism; Attachment to life; Emotional regulation. Conclusions this systematic review identified potential measures of psychological capacity in older adults. The review will inform further work to develop a single comprehensive measure of psychological capacity in older adults.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference47 articles.

1. The UN decade of healthy ageing: strengthening measurement for monitoring health and wellbeing of older people;Thiyagarajan;Age Ageing,2022

2. The structure and predictive value of intrinsic capacity in a longitudinal study of ageing;Beard;BMJ Open,2019

3. Intrinsic capacity: validation of a new WHO concept for healthy aging in a longitudinal Chinese study;Beard;J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci,2022

4. A rapid review of the measurement of intrinsic capacity in older adults;George;J Nutr Health Aging,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3