How quality improvement collaboratives work to improve healthcare in care homes: a realist evaluation

Author:

Devi Reena1,Chadborn Neil H23,Meyer Julienne4,Banerjee Jay5,Goodman Claire67ORCID,Dening Tom2,Gladman John R F238,Hinsliff-Smith Kathryn9,Long Annabelle2,Usman Adeela2,Housley Gemma10,Lewis Sarah2,Glover Matthew11,Gage Heather11,Logan Philippa A23812,Martin Finbarr C13ORCID,Gordon Adam L2348

Affiliation:

1. School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

2. School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

3. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration - East Midlands (ARC-EM), UK

4. School of Health Sciences, City University of London, London, UK

5. University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, University of Leicester, Leicester, and Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

6. School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK

7. NIHR Applied Research Collaboration – East of England (ARC-EoE), UK

8. NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK

9. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK

10. Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

11. Surrey Health Economics Centre, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

12. Nottingham CityCare Partnership, NHS Provider Service, Nottingham, UK

13. Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Quality improvement collaboratives (QICs) bring together multidisciplinary teams in a structured process to improve care quality. How QICs can be used to support healthcare improvement in care homes is not fully understood. Methods A realist evaluation to develop and test a programme theory of how QICs work to improve healthcare in care homes. A multiple case study design considered implementation across 4 sites and 29 care homes. Observations, interviews and focus groups captured contexts and mechanisms operating within QICs. Data analysis classified emerging themes using context-mechanism-outcome configurations to explain how NHS and care home staff work together to design and implement improvement. Results QICs will be able to implement and iterate improvements in care homes where they have a broad and easily understandable remit; recruit staff with established partnership working between the NHS and care homes; use strategies to build relationships and minimise hierarchy; protect and pay for staff time; enable staff to implement improvements aligned with existing work; help members develop plans in manageable chunks through QI coaching; encourage QIC members to recruit multidisciplinary support through existing networks; facilitate meetings in care homes and use shared learning events to build multidisciplinary interventions stepwise. Teams did not use measurement for change, citing difficulties integrating this into pre-existing and QI-related workload. Conclusions These findings outline what needs to be in place for health and social care staff to work together to effect change. Further research needs to consider ways to work alongside staff to incorporate measurement for change into QI.

Funder

Dunhill Medical Trust

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Ageing,General Medicine

Reference36 articles.

1. Optimal healthcare delivery to care homes in the UK: a realist evaluation of what supports effective working to improve healthcare outcomes;Gordon;Age Ageing,2018

2. An evaluation of a safety improvement intervention in care homes in England: a participatory qualitative study;Marshall;J R Soc Med,2018

3. A structured process description of a pragmatic implementation project: improving integrated care for older persons in residential care homes;Poot;Inquiry,2017

4. Toward common data elements for international research in long-term care homes: advancing person-centered care;Corazzini;J Am Med Dir Assoc,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3