Developing a core outcome set for hospital deprescribing trials for older people under the care of a geriatrician

Author:

Martin-Kerry Jacqueline12ORCID,Taylor Jo2,Scott Sion1,Patel Martyn34,Wright David15,Clark Allan4,Turner David4,Alldred David Phillip6,Murphy Katherine7,Keevil Victoria8ORCID,Witham Miles D910,Kellar Ian11,Bhattacharya Debi1

Affiliation:

1. University of Leicester School of Healthcare, , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK

2. University of York Department of Health Sciences, , York YO10 5DD , UK

3. Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital , Norwich NR4 7UY , UK

4. University of East Anglia Norwich Medical School, , Norwich NR4 7TJ , UK

5. University of Bergen School of Pharmacy, , Bergen 5008 , Norway

6. University of Leeds School of Healthcare, , Leeds LS2 9JT , UK

7. Patient and Public Involvement Lead, School of Healthcare, University of Leicester , Leicester, LE1 7RH , UK

8. Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Cambridge CB2 0QQ , UK

9. Newcastle University Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, , Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL , UK

10. Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN , UK

11. University of Leeds School of Psychology, , Leeds LS2 9JU , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Half of older people are prescribed unnecessary/inappropriate medications that are not routinely deprescribed in hospital hence there is a need for deprescribing trials. We aimed to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for deprescribing trials for older people under the care of a geriatrician during hospital admission. Methods We developed a list of potentially relevant outcomes from the literature. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups representing older people and carers, hospital clinicians, hospital managers, and ageing/deprescribing researchers, each outcome was scored according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, followed by two consensus workshops to finalise the COS. Results Two hundred people completed Round 1 and 114 completed Round 2. Representing all stakeholder groups, 10 people participated in workshop 1 and 10 in workshop 2. Six outcomes were identified as most important, feasible and acceptable to collect in a trial: number of prescribed medicines stopped; number of prescribed medicines with dosage reduced; quality of life; mortality; adverse drug events and number of hospital stays. Three other outcomes were identified as important, but currently too burdensome to collect: number of potentially inappropriate medicines prescribed; burden from medication routine; and medication-related admissions to hospital. Conclusions A COS represents the minimum outcomes that should be collected and reported. Whilst uncommon practice for COS development, the value of considering outcome collection feasibility is demonstrated by the removal of three potential outcomes that, if included, may have compromised COS uptake due to challenges with collecting the data.

Funder

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3