Complex interventions for improving independent living and quality of life amongst community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Ho Leonard12ORCID,Malden Stephen12,McGill Kris12,Shimonovich Michal3,Frost Helen12,Aujla Navneet45,Ho Iris S-S12,Shenkin Susan D1262ORCID,Hanratty Barbara45,Mercer Stewart W12,Guthrie Bruce12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Advanced Care Research Centre , Usher Institute, , Edinburgh , UK

2. University of Edinburgh , Usher Institute, , Edinburgh , UK

3. MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow , Glasgow , UK

4. Population Health Sciences Institute , Faculty of Medical Sciences, , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK

5. Newcastle University , Faculty of Medical Sciences, , Newcastle upon Tyne , UK

6. Ageing and Health Research Group , Usher Institute, , Edinburgh , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background community-based complex interventions for older adults have a variety of names, including Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, but often share core components such as holistic needs assessment and care planning. Objective to summarise evidence for the components and effectiveness of community-based complex interventions for improving older adults’ independent living and quality of life (QoL). Methods we searched nine databases and trial registries to February 2022 for randomised controlled trials comparing complex interventions to usual care. Primary outcomes included living at home and QoL. Secondary outcomes included mortality, hospitalisation, institutionalisation, cognitive function and functional status. We pooled data using risk ratios (RRs) or standardised mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results we included 50 trials of mostly moderate quality. Most reported using holistic assessment (94%) and care planning (90%). Twenty-seven (54%) involved multidisciplinary care, with 29.6% delivered mainly by primary care teams without geriatricians. Nurses were the most frequent care coordinators. Complex interventions increased the likelihood of living at home (RR 1.05; 95% CI 1.00–1.10; moderate-quality evidence) but did not affect QoL. Supported by high-quality evidence, they reduced mortality (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.96), enhanced cognitive function (SMD 0.12; 95% CI 0.02–0.22) and improved instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) (SMD 0.11; 95% CI 0.01–0.21) and combined basic/instrumental ADLs (SMD 0.08; 95% CI 0.03–0.13). Conclusions complex interventions involving holistic assessment and care planning increased the chance of living at home, reduced mortality and improved cognitive function and some ADLs.

Funder

Corporate Social Responsibility Programme

Independent Advanced Care Research Centre

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference49 articles.

1. Multi-morbidity and polypharmacy in older people: challenges and opportunities for clinical practice;Aggarwal;Geriatrics,2020

2. What is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)? An umbrella review;Parker;Age Ageing,2018

3. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital;Ellis;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2017

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3