Orthopaedic physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms for observed variation in the implementation of physiotherapy practices in the early postoperative phase after hip fracture: a UK qualitative study

Author:

Volkmer Brittannia1,Sadler Euan2,Lambe Kate1,Martin Finbarr C1,Ayis Salma1,Beaupre Lauren3,Cameron Ian D4,Gregson Celia L5,Johansen Antony6,Kristensen Morten Tange7,Magaziner Jay8,Sackley Catherine1,Smith Toby O9,Sobolev Boris10,Sheehan Katie J1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Population and Environmental Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

2. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

3. Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada

4. John Walsh Centre for Rehabilitation Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

5. Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Translation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

6. Cardiff Trauma Unit, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK

7. PMR-C, Departments of Physiotherapy & Orthopaedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital – Amager and Hvidovre, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

8. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA

9. School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK

10. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Objective to explore physiotherapists’ perceptions of mechanisms to explain observed variation in early postoperative practice after hip fracture surgery demonstrated in a national audit. Methods a qualitative semi-structured interview study of 21 physiotherapists working on orthopaedic wards at seven hospitals with different durations of physiotherapy during a recent audit. Thematic analysis of interviews drawing on Normalisation Process Theory to aid interpretation of findings. Results four themes were identified: achieving protocolised and personalised care; patient and carer engagement; multidisciplinary team engagement across the care continuum and strategies for service improvement. Most expressed variation from protocol was legitimate when driven by what is deemed clinically appropriate for a given patient. This tailored approach was deemed essential to optimise patient and carer engagement. Participants reported inconsistent degrees of engagement from the multidisciplinary team attributing this to competing workload priorities, interpreting ‘postoperative physiotherapy’ as a single professional activity rather than a care delivery approach, plus lack of integration between hospital and community care. All participants recognised changes needed at both structural and process levels to improve their services. Conclusion physiotherapists highlighted an inherent conflict between their intention to deliver protocolised care and allowing for an individual patient-tailored approach. This conflict has implications for how audit results should be interpreted, how future clinical guidelines are written and how physiotherapists are trained. Physiotherapists also described additional factors explaining variation in practice, which may be addressed through increased engagement of the multidisciplinary team and resources for additional staffing and advanced clinical roles.

Funder

Chartered Society of Physiotherapy Charitable Trust

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Ageing,General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Reflections on hip fracture recovery from older adults enrolled in a clinical trial;Stott-Eveneshen;Gerontol Geriatr Med,2017

2. Rehabilitation interventions for improving physical and psychosocial functioning after hip fracture in older people;Crotty;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2010

3. Interventions for improving mobility after hip fracture surgery in adults;Handoll;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3