Measures of perceived mobility ability in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review of psychometric properties

Author:

Beauchamp Marla12ORCID,Hao Qiukui12,Kuspinar Ayse12,Alder Gésine2,Makino Keitaro23ORCID,Nouredanesh Mina12,Zhao Yunli4,Mikton Christopher5,Thiyagarajan Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli6,Diaz Theresa7,Raina Parminder248

Affiliation:

1. McMaster University School of Rehabilitation Science, , Hamilton, ON , Canada

2. McMaster University McMaster Institute for Research on Aging, , Hamilton, ON , Canada

3. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology Department of Preventive Gerontology, , Obu , Japan

4. McMaster University Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, , Hamilton, ON , Canada

5. World Health Organization Demographic Change and Healthy Aging Unit, Social Determinants of Health, , Geneva , Switzerland

6. World Health Organization Ageing and Health Unit, Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

7. World Health Organization Department of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Ageing, , Geneva , Switzerland

8. McMaster University Labarge Centre for Mobility in Aging, , Hamilton, ON , Canada

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe objective of this systematic review was to synthesise the psychometric properties of measures of perceived mobility ability and related frameworks used to define and operationalise mobility in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsWe registered the review protocol with PROSPERO (CRD42022306689) and included studies that examined the psychometric properties of perceived mobility measures in community-dwelling older adults. Five databases were searched to identify potentially relevant primary studies. We qualitatively summarised psychometric property estimates and related operational frameworks. We conducted risk of bias and overall quality assessments, and meta-analyses when at least three studies were included for a particular outcome. The synthesised results were compared against the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments criteria for good measurement properties.ResultsA total of 36 studies and 17 measures were included in the review. The Late-Life Function and Disability Index: function component (LLFDI-FC), lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), Mobility Assessment Tool (MAT)-short form (MAT-SF) or MAT-Walking, and Perceived Driving Abilities (PDA) Scale were identified with three or more eligible studies. Most measures showed sufficient test–retest reliability (moderate or high), while the PDA scale showed insufficient reliability (low). Most measures had sufficient or inconsistent convergent validity (low or moderate) or known-groups validity (low or very low), but their predictive validity and responsiveness were insufficient or inconsistent (low or very low). Few studies used a conceptual model.ConclusionThe LLFDI-FC, LEFS, PDA and MAT-SF/Walking can be used in community-dwelling older adults by considering the summarised psychometric properties. No available comprehensive mobility measure was identified that covered all mobility domains.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3