Investigating the feasibility and reliability of the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale

Author:

McGarrigle Lisa12ORCID,Squires Emma1,Wallace Lindsay M K12,Godin Judith12,Gorman Mary13,Rockwood Kenneth12,Theou Olga12

Affiliation:

1. Geriatric Medicine Research, Centre for Health Care of the Elderly, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax B3H 2E1, Nova Scotia, Canada

2. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax B3H 2E1, Nova Scotia, Canada

3. St. Martha’s Regional Hospital, Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract

Abstract Background the Pictorial Fit-Frail Scale (PFFS) was designed as a simple and practical approach to the identification of frailty. Objectives To investigate the feasibility and reliability of this visual image-based tool, when used by patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in clinical settings. Design observational study. Setting three outpatient geriatric healthcare settings. Subjects patients (n = 132), caregivers (n = 84), clinic nurses (n = 7) and physicians (n = 10). Methods the PFFS was administered to all patients. Where available, HCPs and caregivers completed the scale based on the patients’ health. In the geriatric day hospital, the PFFS was completed on admission and administered again within 7–14 days. Time and level of assistance needed to complete the scale were recorded. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to assess test−retest and inter-rater reliability. Results mean time to complete the scale (minutes:seconds ± SD) was 4:30 ± 1:54 for patients, 3:13 ± 1:34 for caregivers, 1:28 ± 0:57 for nurses and 1:32 ± 1:40 for physicians. Most patients were able to complete the scale unassisted (64%). Mean patient PFFS score was 11.1 ± 5.3, mean caregiver score was 13.2 ± 6.3, mean nurse score was 10.7 ± 4.5 and mean physician score was 11.1 ± 5.6; caregiver scores were significantly higher than patient (P < 0.01), nurse (P < 0.001) and physician (P < 0.01) scores. Test−retest reliability was good for patients (ICC = 0.78, [95%CI = 0.67–0.86]) and nurses (ICC = 0.88 [0.80–0.93]). Inter-rater reliability between HCPs was also good (ICC = 0.75 [0.63–0.83]). Conclusion the PFFS is a feasible and reliable tool for use with patients, caregivers and HCPs in clinical settings. Further research on the validity and responsiveness of the tool is necessary.

Funder

Mitacs Elevate Program as the recipient of a Postdoctoral Fellowship

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Canadian Frailty Network

Nova Scotia Health Authority Research

Dalhousie Medical Research Foundation Kathryn Allen Weldon Chair of Alzheimer Disease Research

Fountain Family Innovation Fund of the Queen Elizabeth II Health Research Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Frailty in elderly people;Clegg;Lancet,2013

2. Epidemiology of aging;Ferrucci;Radiol Clin N Am,2008

3. Validation of an index to estimate the prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling seniors;Hoover;Health Rep,2013

4. The impact of frailty on intensive care unit outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Muscedere;Intensive Care Med,2017

5. Home-based health promotion for older people with mild frailty: the HomeHealth intervention development and feasibility RCT;Walters;Health Technol Assess,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3