Mild Cognitive Impairment: the Manchester consensus

Author:

Dunne Ross A1ORCID,Aarsland Dag2,O’Brien John T3,Ballard Clive4,Banerjee Sube5,Fox Nick C6,Isaacs Jeremy D7,Underwood Benjamin R8,Perry Richard J9,Chan Dennis10,Dening Tom11,Thomas Alan J12,Schryer Jeffrey13,Jones Anne-Marie14,Evans Alison R15,Alessi Charles16,Coulthard Elizabeth J17,Pickett James18,Elton Peter19,Jones Roy W20,Mitchell Susan15,Hooper Nigel21,Kalafatis Chris22,Rasmussen Jill G C23,Martin Helen24,Schott Jonathan M25,Burns Alistair26

Affiliation:

1. Greater Manchester Dementia Research Centre, Greater Manchester Mental Health Foundation Trust, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL,UK

2. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London SE5 8AF, UK

3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge CB2 0SP, UK

4. University of Exeter. Exeter, UK

5. University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK

6. University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

7. St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, UK

8. Gnodde Goldman Sachs Translational Neuroscience Unit, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

9. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

10. Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, UCL, London, UK

11. Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

12. Newcastle University, Gateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK

13. Bury Clinical Commissioning Group, Bury, UK

14. AGE UK, Trafford, Manchester M41 9EH, UK

15. Alzheimer’s Research UK, Cambridge, UK

16. Public Health England, London, UK

17. University of Bristol, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK

18. The Alzheimer’s Society, London EC3N 2AE UK

19. Greater Manchester and Eastern Cheshire Strategic Clinical Network, Manchester M1 3BN UK

20. The Research Institute for the Care of Older People, Royal United Hospital, Combe Park, Bath BA1 3NG, UK

21. Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

22. Clinical Trials/S&L Care Home Intervention Team, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Old Age Psychiatry, IOPPN, London SE5 8AF, UK

23. Royal Coll General Practitioners, Dementia, London, UK

24. Greater Manchester Dementia Research Centre, Palliative Care Lead, Dementia United, Greater Manchester Health and Social Care Partnership, Manchester M! 2BN, UK

25. Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London WC1N 3BG, UK

26. Division of Neuroscience and Experimental Psychology, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

Abstract

Abstract Given considerable variation in diagnostic and therapeutic practice, there is a need for national guidance on the use of neuroimaging, fluid biomarkers, cognitive testing, follow-up and diagnostic terminology in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). MCI is a heterogenous clinical syndrome reflecting a change in cognitive function and deficits on neuropsychological testing but relatively intact activities of daily living. MCI is a risk state for further cognitive and functional decline with 5–15% of people developing dementia per year. However, ~50% remain stable at 5 years and in a minority, symptoms resolve over time. There is considerable debate about whether MCI is a useful clinical diagnosis, or whether the use of the term prevents proper inquiry (by history, examination and investigations) into underlying causes of cognitive symptoms, which can include prodromal neurodegenerative disease, other physical or psychiatric illness, or combinations thereof. Cognitive testing, neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers can improve the sensitivity and specificity of aetiological diagnosis, with growing evidence that these may also help guide prognosis. Diagnostic criteria allow for a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease to be made where MCI is accompanied by appropriate biomarker changes, but in practice, such biomarkers are not available in routine clinical practice in the UK. This would change if disease-modifying therapies became available and required a definitive diagnosis but would present major challenges to the National Health Service and similar health systems. Significantly increased investment would be required in training, infrastructure and provision of fluid biomarkers and neuroimaging. Statistical techniques combining markers may provide greater sensitivity and specificity than any single disease marker but their practical usefulness will depend on large-scale studies to ensure ecological validity and that multiple measures, e.g. both cognitive tests and biomarkers, are widely available for clinical use. To perform such large studies, we must increase research participation amongst those with MCI.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3