A clinical tool to identify older women with back pain at high risk of osteoporotic vertebral fractures (Vfrac): a population-based cohort study with exploratory economic evaluation

Author:

Khera Tarnjit K1,Hunt Linda P1,Davis Sarah2,Gooberman-Hill Rachael34,Thom Howard4,Xu Yixin4,Paskins Zoe56,Peters Tim J1,Tobias Jon H17,Clark Emma M18

Affiliation:

1. Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol , Bristol, UK

2. School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield , Sheffield, UK

3. NIHR Bristol Biomedical Research Centre , Bristol, UK

4. University of Bristol Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, , Bristol, UK

5. Keele University School of Medicine, , Staffordshire, UK

6. Midland Partnership NHS Foundation Trust Haywood Academic Rheumatology Centre, , Stoke-on-Trent, UK

7. University of Bristol MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, , UK

8. North Bristol NHS Trust , Bristol, UK

Abstract

Abstract Background osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) identify people at high risk of future fractures, but despite this, less than a third come to clinical attention. The objective of this study was to develop a clinical tool to aid health care professionals decide which older women with back pain should have a spinal radiograph. Methods a population-based cohort of 1,635 women aged 65+ years with self-reported back pain in the previous 4 months were recruited from primary care. Exposure data were collected through self-completion questionnaires and physical examination, including descriptions of back pain and traditional risk factors for osteoporosis. Outcome was the presence/absence of OVFs on spinal radiographs. Logistic regression models identified independent predictors of OVFs, with the area under the (receiver operating) curve calculated for the final model, and a cut-point was identified. Results mean age was 73.9 years and 209 (12.8%) had OVFs. The final Vfrac model comprised 15 predictors of OVF, with an AUC of 0.802 (95% CI: 0.764–0.840). Sensitivity was 72.4% and specificity was 72.9%. Vfrac identified 93% of those with more than one OVF and two-thirds of those with one OVF. Performance was enhanced by inclusion of self-reported back pain descriptors, removal of which reduced AUC to 0.742 (95% CI: 0.696–0.788) and sensitivity to 66.5%. Health economic modelling to support a future trial was favourable. Conclusions the Vfrac clinical tool appears to be valid and is improved by the addition of self-reported back pain symptoms. The tool now requires testing to establish real-world clinical and cost-effectiveness.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Bristol Biomedical Research Centre

Arthritis Research UK

Versus Arthritis

National Institute for Health Research

Chartered Society for Physiotherapists

General Council for Nursing in England and Wales

Haywood Foundation

Royal Osteoporosis Society

Elizabeth Blackwell Institute

Southmead Hospital Charity

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3