Utilisation of general practice health assessments around an aged care assessment is associated with lower mortality risk in older Australians

Author:

Visvanathan Renuka12,Amare Azmeraw T34,Lang Catherine3,Khadka Jyoti3,Yu Solomon12,Beilby Justin15,Wesselingh Steve3,Inacio Maria C36

Affiliation:

1. National Health and Medical Research Council Centre of Research Excellence in Frailty and Healthy Ageing, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

2. Aged and Extended Care Services, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

3. Healthy Ageing Research Consortium, Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

4. Adelaide GTRAC Centre, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia

5. Torrens University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

6. Division of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Objective (i) to describe the general practitioner utilisation of health assessments, management plans, coordination of team care arrangements and medication review item numbers within 6 months of an aged care eligibility assessment for home care packages (HCP) and (ii) investigate the impact of health assessments on the risk of mortality and entry into permanent residential aged care (PRAC) of individuals accessing HCP. Design and setting retrospective cohort study utilising data from the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) was conducted. Subjects 75,172 individuals aged ≥75 years who received HCP between 2011 and 2015. Outcome measure for objective 1: the use of comprehensive assessments (Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) items 705 or 707), management plans (MBS 721), coordination of team care arrangements (MBS 723), and medication reviews (MBS 900). For objective 2: time to death and entry into PRAC. Results of the 75,172 individuals, 28.2% (95% confidence interval (CI): 27.8–8.5%) had comprehensive assessments, 36.7% (95% CI: 36.3–37.0%) had management plans, 33.0% (95% CI: 32.7–33.3%) received coordination of team care arrangements and 5.4% (95% CI: 5.2–5.5%) had medication reviews. Individuals with a comprehensive assessment had a 5% lower risk of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 95% CI = 0.95, 0.92–0.98) but 5% higher risk of transition to PRAC (adjusted subdistribution HRs, 95% CI = 1.05, 1.02–1.08) compared to those who did not have these services. Conclusion the utilisation of health assessments was associated with a lower risk of mortality. There is an opportunity for increased use of item numbers in frailer individuals.

Funder

South Australian Government provided

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Centre of Research Excellence Scheme

Hospital Research Foundation

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Aging,General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. What is comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA)? An umbrella review;Parker;Age Ageing,2018

2. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials;Ellis;BMJ,2011

3. Comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care: a systematic review;Garrard;Aging Clin Exp Res,2019

4. Trends in uptake of the 75+ health assessment in Australia: a decade of evaluation;Hamirudin;Aust J Prim Health,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3