Capturing the ghost in the machine: a process for development and validation of measures of phenomenal consciousness in delirium

Author:

Eeles Eamonn123,Tran David Duc4ORCID,Ward Sarah5,Teodorczuk Andrew678,Ray Julian9,Miller Tim10,Dissanayaka Nadeeka N311

Affiliation:

1. Internal Medicine Service, The Prince Charles Hospital , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

2. School of Medicine, Northside Clinical School, The Prince Charles Hospital , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

3. Dementia and Neuro Mental Health Research Unit, UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

4. University of Queensland Medical School, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

5. Geriatric Medicine Department, Redcliffe Hospital , Anzac Avenue, Redcliffe, QLD , Australia

6. Northside Clinical Unit, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

7. School of Nursing, QUT , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

8. The Prince Charles Hospital, Metro North Mental Health , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

9. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology , Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals Neurosciences, Cambridge , UK

10. University of Queensland, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science , Brisbane, QLD , Australia

11. NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Fellow , UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, QLD Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background Delirium has conventionally been considered a disorder of consciousness. Alertness and arousal are used as surrogates in clinical practice but are insufficient for the purposes of a more dimensional assessment of consciousness. We present a process of development and validation of candidate measures of phenomenal consciousness that could be applied to the diagnosis of delirium. Methods First, a narrative review of available instruments in the fields of phenomenal consciousness, including prereflective consciousness, the phenomenal-sensed experience and reflective thought, was undertaken. Eligibility of tools in the context of applicability to delirium was based upon objectivity in test interpretation and the requirement for tester administration. Second, where there was a gap in suitable cognitive tools, new items were derived using the silent generation technique. A process of face and construct validity using a diverse panel of experts was performed, and readability was evaluated. Results 814 articles were screened from the literature review. Fourteen candidate tools were reported from the three domains of phenomenal consciousness. One of these met the eligibility criteria for a delirium assessment. Fifty-seven new tests of phenomenal consciousness were identified. After a process of item reduction, a total of 26 individual tests were identified. After content validity, 22 of the 26 items were retained. The scale average content validity index was 0.89. The agreement between raters was between 80% and 97%. 100% of responses for face validity were rated as positive. Flesch Reading Ease Score was 91.6 (very easy to read). Conclusions Candidate measures of phenomenal consciousness are described, and early validity studies are promising.

Funder

Advancing Queensland Fellowship

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3