Affiliation:
1. St Catherine University , St Paul, MN , USA
2. World Bank , USA
3. Global Development Studies, Saint Mary’s University , Halifax , Canada
Abstract
Abstract
The vast majority of refugees globally are hosted in developing countries. In Jordan and Lebanon, nearly one in ten people are refugees. This paper reviews how different policy environments in Jordan and Lebanon have shaped economic outcomes for Syrian refugees, focusing on education, work, social assistance, and welfare outcomes. The review summarizes key research on how to improve refugee economic outcomes. We demonstrate that there can be effective service delivery for refugees, dependent on state capacity. For example, differences in policy led to better education outcomes for Syrian refugees in Jordan than in Lebanon. A variety of interventions can support refugee livelihoods, while generally doing no harm to host communities. Both countries also demonstrate the difficulties of achieving refugee economic self-sufficiency. Although Jordan has allowed (limited) legal work opportunities for refugees, Syrian refugees in both countries remain primarily in precarious work and supported by international aid.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference121 articles.
1. ‘Migration Shocks and Housing: Short-Run Impact of the Syrian Refugee Crisis in Jordan’;Al-Hawarin;Journal of Housing Economics,2021
2. ‘The Short-Lived Effects of Unconditional Cash Transfers to Refugees’;Altındag;mimeo,2021
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献