Affiliation:
1. Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford
2. London School of Economics and Political Science
3. Columbia University
4. University of Cambridge
Abstract
AbstractThe COVID-19 crisis is likely to have dramatic consequences for progress on climate change. Imminent fiscal recovery packages could entrench or partly displace the current fossil-fuel-intensive economic system. Here, we survey 231 central bank officials, finance ministry officials, and other economic experts from G20 countries on the relative performance of 25 major fiscal recovery archetypes across four dimensions: speed of implementation, economic multiplier, climate impact potential, and overall desirability. We identify five policies with high potential on both economic multiplier and climate impact metrics: clean physical infrastructure, building efficiency retrofits, investment in education and training, natural capital investment, and clean R&D. In lower- and middle-income countries (LMICs) rural support spending is of particular value while clean R&D is less important. These recommendations are contextualized through analysis of the short-run impacts of COVID-19 on greenhouse gas curtailment and plausible medium-run shifts in the habits and behaviours of humans and institutions.
Funder
Downforce Trust
Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics
Reference120 articles.
1. ‘The Macroeconomic Effects of Public Investment: Evidence from Advanced Economies’,;Abiad,2015
2. ‘The Environment and Directed Technical Change’,;Acemoglu;The American Economic Review,2012
3. ‘Path Dependence, Innovation and the Economics of Climate Change’;Aghion,2014
4. Escaping the Energy Poverty Trap
5. ‘A Net-zero Emissions Economic Recovery from COVID-19’,;Allan,2020
Cited by
451 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献