#3472 PRELIMINARY DATA FROM MOTHER HDX STUDY: A MULTICENTRE OPEN-LABEL RCT STUDY TO EXPLORE THE MORBIMORTALITY WITH THE THERANOVA HDX VS OL-HDF

Author:

Ortiz Patricia De Sequera1,García Rafael Pérez1,Vega Almudena2,Maduell Francisco3

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Nephrology, Madrid, Spain

2. Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Nephrology, Madrid, Spain

3. Hospital Clinic, Nephrology, Barcelona, Spain

Abstract

Abstract Background and Aims Dialysis patients have a high rate of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. For this reason, new technical advances are necessary to be introduced in clinical practice. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes are a new generation of membranes that allow the removal of a greater number of medium-sized molecules compared to high-flux hemodialysis (HF-HD) but retaining albumin. Theranova, a MCO membrane has an increased permeability and also produces high convective volume in the form of internal filtration. For these special properties, MCO generated a new concept of therapy called expanded HD (HDx). Until now, online hemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has demonstrated its superiority, in terms of survival, compared to HF-HD. But the comparison between OL-HDF and HDx is a question not solved. Method The MOTheR HDx study trial (NCT03714386) is an open-label, multicentric, prospective, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HDx compared to OL-HDF in incident HD patients in Spain for up to 36 months. The main endpoint is to determinate if HDx is non inferior to OL-HDF at reducing the combined outcome of all-cause dead and stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), acute coronary syndrome (angina and myocardial infarction), peripheral arterial disease (amputation or revascularization) and ischemic colitis (mesenteric thrombosis). Results Now we have enrolled 513 patients, 44 excluded and 469 were randomized. 229 were allocated to HDx and 240 to OL-HDF. No differences were found in neither baseline characteristics, hemodialysis or pharmacological treatment, nor laboratory parameters. Follow up time was similar in both groups: 15.06 (12.8) vs 13.73 (11.51) months [HR 0.84 (0.50-1.40)] without differences in mortality: 29 (12.7%) vs 31 (12.9%) [HR 0.89 (0.54-1.48)] in HDx and HDF respectively (Figure 1). Conclusion These preliminary results from Mother study support that HDx is not inferior to OL-HDF in reducing the all-cause mortality outcome.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Transplantation,Nephrology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3