Affiliation:
1. Universidad Carlos III and CEPR, Spain, leandro.prados.delaescosura@uc3m.es
Abstract
Abstract
Spain’s investment boom (1850–1874) has been largely attributed to capital inflows. Sudrià challenged the consensus on the basis of Moro et al. capital balance estimates. Dishoarding of bullion and previous savings would have catered for an increasing investment demand. I argue that the empirical basis for Sudrià's claim is flawed. Moro et al. underestimated the net capital inflow and biased upwards the change in reserves. The current account deficit resulted from an inflow of capital that allowed investment to raise facilitating imports of capital goods and raw materials. Foreign capital contributed significantly to the investment boom.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),History
Reference35 articles.
1. Foreign capital flows in the century of Britain’s industrial revolution: new estimates, controlled conjectures;Brezis;Economic History Review,1995
2. Les investissements étrangers en Espagne au XIXe siècle: méthodologie et quantification;Broder;Revue d’Histoire Economique et Sociale,1976
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Exports and long-run growth: The case of Spain, 1850-2020;Journal of Applied Economics;2022-12-31
2. THE CURRENT ACCOUNT OF THE SPANISH ECONOMY, 1850-2016: WAS IT OPTIMAL?;Revista de Historia Económica / Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History;2019-10-18