The efficacy of azithromycin and doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Kong Fabian Yuh Shiong1,Tabrizi Sepehr N.23,Fairley Christopher Kincaid45,Vodstrcil Lenka A.125,Huston Wilhelmina M.6,Chen Marcus5,Bradshaw Catriona5,Hocking Jane S.1

Affiliation:

1. 1  Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, 3/207 Bouverie St, Melbourne 3004, Australia

2. 2  Murdoch Children's Research Institute, 50 Flemington Rd, Parkville 3052, Australia

3. 3  Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, The Royal Women's Hospital, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052, Australia

4. 4  Monash University, Central Clinical School, 580 Swanston St, Melbourne 3053, Australia

5. 5  Melbourne Sexual Health Centre, 580 Swanston St, Melbourne 3053, Australia

6. 6  School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St, Brisbane 4000, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Background There are increasing concerns about treatment failure following treatment for rectal chlamydia with 1 g of azithromycin. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the efficacy of 1 g of azithromycin as a single dose or 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for 7 days for the treatment of rectal chlamydia. Methods Medline, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Register and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched to the end of April 2014. Studies using 1 g of azithromycin or 7 days of doxycycline for the treatment of rectal chlamydia were eligible. Gender, diagnostic test, serovar, symptomatic status, other sexually transmitted infections, follow-up time, attrition and microbial cure were extracted. Meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled (i) azithromycin and doxycycline efficacy and (ii) efficacy difference. Results All eight included studies were observational. The random-effects pooled efficacy for azithromycin (based on eight studies) was 82.9% (95% CI 76.0%–89.8%; I2 = 71.0%; P < 0.01) and for doxycycline (based on five studies) was 99.6% (95% CI 98.6%–100%; I2 = 0%; P = 0.571), resulting in a random-effects pooled efficacy difference (based on five studies) of 19.9% (95% CI 11.4%–28.3%; I2 = 48.5%; P = 0.101) in favour of doxycycline. Conclusions The efficacy of single-dose azithromycin may be considerably lower than 1 week of doxycycline for treating rectal chlamydia. However, the available evidence is very poor. Robust randomized controlled trials are urgently required.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Pharmacology (medical),Pharmacology,Microbiology (medical)

Reference54 articles.

Cited by 104 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3