Abusive pricing practices by online platforms: a framework review of Article 102 TFEU for future cases

Author:

Mandrescu Daniel

Abstract

Abstract The challenges involved in the application of Article 102 TFEU to online platforms have become the main topic of debate in the context of EU competition policy in digital markets. This debate has recently also extended to the topic of platform pricing with the complaints about the pricing strategies of Apple with respect to its App Store and it is a matter of time before similar complaints will follow with respect to other prominent platforms. Applying the current framework of price related abuses under Article 102 TFEU to the pricing practices of online platforms will, however, require adapting the respective legal tests of abuse to the commercial reality of these actors. Doing so will inevitably entail accounting for their multisided nature which would sometimes require that the assessments of abuse extend to more than one side of the platform. Furthermore, such legal assessments would also have to consider the special role played by platform pricing as a coordination tool for getting multiple types of customer groups on board with the aim of facilitating profitable interactions between them. Therefore, this article seeks to explore how the current frameworks for price-related abuses could be applied and, if needed, adapted so as to fit the commercial reality of online platforms. The aim of this effort is to provide guidance for ongoing and future cases so as to prevent legitimate pricing practices from being erroneously scrutinized as well as to prevent anti-competitive pricing practices from escaping legal scrutiny due to the intricacies of platform pricing schemes.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Law

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Antitrust risks of platform pricing;Russian Journal of Economics;2024-07-04

2. Comparing Regional Law;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

3. Comparative Law beyond the State;The Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law;2024-02-01

4. Separation of Powers and Antitrust;ASCL STUD COMP LAW;2023-09-28

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3