An evidence cycle framework for community development initiatives

Author:

Browne Geoffrey R1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melbourne School of Design , Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010 , Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Abstract Evidence is a central concept in epistemology, and good evidence is essential for developing effective community development programs. There is a range of theoretical approaches for helping to understand and ensure program effectiveness, but none uses evidence as a central pivot, and they may be difficult for the managers of community development programs to apply. An evidence-focussed theoretical framework and tool could help build the evidence literacy of communities and their advocates, assist community groups and members that struggle to gain representation, and help ensure that community development programs are inclusive, efficient, and effectively improve health and wellbeing outcomes. This paper presents an eight-step evidence cycle conceptual framework for helping communities ensure evidence is foundational to all stages of their programs. The steps are recognize, gather, appraise, integrate, use, create, manage, and share evidence. Each step is described, and example approaches applicable to both descriptive and intervention evidence are provided. A tool (specifically, a rubric) for program managers to self-assess their work against the cycle, informed by UK-based development network, Bond’s five principles for evidence use in community development (voice/inclusion, appropriateness, triangulation, contribution, and transparency), is also provided. The approach, which is applicable to all stages of a program, has the potential to not only increase managers’ and participants’ evidence literacy, but to also facilitate attention to evidence throughout the life of a program and beyond, leading to better results for community development.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Development

Reference80 articles.

1. Urban planning and health: revitalising the alliance;Arthurson;Urban Policy and Research,2016

2. A health map for the local human habitat;Barton;Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health,2006

3. An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist;Bauer;BMC Psychology,2015

4. T-CaST: an implementation theory comparison and selection tool;Birken;Implementation Science,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3