Scalp recorded spike ripples predict seizure risk in childhood epilepsy better than spikes

Author:

Kramer Mark A1,Ostrowski Lauren M2,Song Daniel Y2,Thorn Emily L2,Stoyell Sally M2,Parnes McKenna2,Chinappen Dhinakaran2,Xiao Grace2,Eden Uri T1,Staley Kevin J23,Stufflebeam Steven M345,Chu Catherine J23

Affiliation:

1. Boston University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston, MA, USA

2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Neurology, Boston, MA, USA

3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

4. Massachusetts General Hospital, Department of Radiology, Boston, MA, USA

5. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Charlestown, MA, USA

Abstract

Abstract In the past decade, brief bursts of fast oscillations in the ripple range have been identified in the scalp EEG as a promising non-invasive biomarker for epilepsy. However, investigation and clinical application of this biomarker have been limited because standard approaches to identify these brief, low amplitude events are difficult, time consuming, and subjective. Recent studies have demonstrated that ripples co-occurring with epileptiform discharges (‘spike ripple events’) are easier to detect than ripples alone and have greater pathological significance. Here, we used objective techniques to quantify spike ripples and test whether this biomarker predicts seizure risk in childhood epilepsy. We evaluated spike ripples in scalp EEG recordings from a prospective cohort of children with a self-limited epilepsy syndrome, benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes, and healthy control children. We compared the rate of spike ripples between children with epilepsy and healthy controls, and between children with epilepsy during periods of active disease (active, within 1 year of seizure) and after a period of sustained seizure-freedom (seizure-free, >1 year without seizure), using semi-automated and automated detection techniques. Spike ripple rate was higher in subjects with active epilepsy compared to healthy controls (P = 0.0018) or subjects with epilepsy who were seizure-free ON or OFF medication (P = 0.0018). Among epilepsy subjects with spike ripples, each month seizure-free decreased the odds of a spike ripple by a factor of 0.66 [95% confidence interval (0.47, 0.91), P = 0.021]. Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the presence of at least one spike ripple versus a classic spike event to identify group, we found comparable sensitivity and negative predictive value, but greater specificity and positive predictive value of spike ripples compared to spikes (P = 0.016 and P = 0.006, respectively). We found qualitatively consistent results using a fully automated spike ripple detector, including comparison with an automated spike detector. We conclude that scalp spike ripple events identify disease and track with seizure risk in this epilepsy population, using both semi-automated and fully automated detection methods, and that this biomarker outperforms analysis of spikes alone in categorizing seizure risk. These data provide evidence that spike ripples are a specific non-invasive biomarker for seizure risk in benign epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes and support future work to evaluate the utility of this biomarker to guide medication trials and tapers in these children and predict seizure risk in other at-risk populations.

Funder

NINDS

NSF

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Reference68 articles.

1. Interictal scalp fast oscillations as a marker of the seizure onset zone;Andrade-Valenca;Neurology,2011

2. Interictal high frequency oscillations (HFOs) in patients with focal epilepsy and normal MRI;Andrade-Valenca;Clin Neurophysiol,2012

3. A prospective, open, controlled and randomised study of clobazam versus carbamazepine in patients with frequent episodes of rolandic epilepsy;Andrade;Rev Neurol,2009

4. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing;Benjamini;J R Stat Soc Ser B,1995

5. Modeling remission and relapse in pediatric epilepsy: application of a Markov process;Berg;Epilepsy Res,2004

Cited by 69 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3