The clinical, imaging, pathological and genetic landscape of bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia

Author:

Macdonald-Laurs Emma123ORCID,Warren Aaron E L24ORCID,Francis Peter5,Mandelstam Simone A235ORCID,Lee Wei Shern36ORCID,Coleman Matthew36ORCID,Stephenson Sarah E M36ORCID,Barton Sarah123ORCID,D’Arcy Colleen7ORCID,Lockhart Paul J36ORCID,Leventer Richard J123ORCID,Harvey A Simon123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurology, The Royal Children’s Hospital , Parkville, Victoria, 3052   Australia

2. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Parkville, Victoria, 3052 , Australia

3. Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne , Parkville, Victoria, 3052 , Australia

4. Department of Medicine (Austin Health), The University of Melbourne , Heidelberg, Victoria, 3084 , Australia

5. Department of Medical Imaging, The Royal Children’s Hospital , Parkville, Victoria, 3052 , Australia

6. Bruce Lefroy Centre, Murdoch Children’s Research Institute , Parkville, Victoria, 3052 , Australia

7. Department of Pathology, The Royal Children’s Hospital , Parkville, Victoria, 3052 , Australia

Abstract

Abstract Bottom-of-sulcus dysplasia (BOSD) is increasingly recognised as a cause of drug-resistant, surgically-remediable, focal epilepsy, often in seemingly MRI-negative patients. We describe the clinical manifestations, morphological features, localisation patterns, and genetics of BOSD, with the aims of improving management and understanding pathogenesis. We studied 85 patients with BOSD diagnosed between 2005-2022. Presenting seizure and EEG characteristics, clinical course, genetic findings, and treatment response were obtained from medical records. 3T-MRI and 18F-FDG-PET scans were reviewed systematically for BOSD morphology and metabolism. Histopathological analysis and tissue genetic testing were performed in 64 operated patients. BOSD locations were transposed to common imaging space to study anatomical location, functional network localisation, and relationship to normal MTOR gene expression. All patients presented with stereotyped focal seizures with rapidly escalating frequency, prompting hospitalisation in 48%. Despite 42% patients having seizure remissions, usually with sodium channel blocking medications, most eventually became drug-resistant and underwent surgery (86% seizure-free). Prior developmental delay was uncommon but intellectual, language and executive dysfunction were present in 24%, 48% and 29% when assessed preoperatively, low intellect being associated with greater epilepsy duration. BOSDs were missed on initial MRI in 68%, being ultimately recognised following repeat MRI, 18F-FDG-PET or image post-processing. MRI features were grey-white junction blurring (100%), cortical thickening (91%), transmantle band (62%), increased cortical T1 signal (46%) and increased subcortical FLAIR signal (26%). BOSD hypometabolism was present on 18F-FDG-PET in 99%. Additional areas of cortical malformation or grey matter heterotopia were present in eight patients. BOSDs predominated in frontal and pericentral cortex and related functional networks, mostly sparing temporal and occipital cortex, and limbic and visual networks. Genetic testing yielded pathogenic mTOR pathway variants in 63% patients, including somatic MTOR variants in 47% operated patients and germline DEPDC5 or NPRL3 variants in 73% patients with familial focal epilepsy. BOSDs tended to occur in regions where the healthy brain normally shows lower MTOR expression, suggesting these regions may be more vulnerable to up-regulation of MTOR activity. Consistent with the existing literature, these results highlight (1) clinical features raising suspicion of BOSD, (2) the role of somatic and germline mTOR pathway variants in patients with sporadic and familial focal epilepsy associated with BOSD and (3) the role of 18F-FDG-PET alongside high-field MRI in detecting subtle BOSD. The anatomical and functional distribution of BOSDs likely explain their seizure, EEG, and cognitive manifestations, and may relate to relative MTOR expression.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3