Chest wall perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: international survey on attitudes and training needs

Author:

Karakatsanis Andreas12ORCID,Sund Malin34,Rocco Nicola56ORCID,Dietz Jill R7,Kothari Ashutosh89,Hamdi Mustapha10,Masannat Yazan A111213,Barry Peter A14

Affiliation:

1. Department for Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden

2. Section for Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital , Uppsala , Sweden

3. Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Umeå University , Umeå , Sweden

4. Department of Surgery/CLINICUM, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital , Helsinki , Finland

5. G.Re.T.A. Group for Reconstructive and Therapeutic Advancements Fondazione ETS , Naples , Italy

6. Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples ‘Federico II’ , Naples , Italy

7. Breast Surgeon , Cleveland, Ohio , USA

8. Department of Breast Surgery, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK

9. Life Sciences and Medicine, Kings College , London , UK

10. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Department, Brussels University Hospital , Brussels , Belgium

11. Breast Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, NHS Grampian , Aberdeen , UK

12. iBreastBook , Aberdeen, Scotland

13. School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen , Aberdeen , UK

14. Department of Breast Surgery, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust , Sutton , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Volume replacement using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPFs) is a promising technique to reduce mastectomy rates without sacrificing function or aesthetics. Owing to limited availability of the technique, only a minority of patients currently have access to CWPF procedures. Methods An international web-based survey was disseminated through social media, dedicated webpages, and national and international societies for breast surgery. The survey explored surgeons’ attitudes towards CWPFs and their perceived training needs. Results Of 619 respondents, 88.4 per cent agreed that CWPF surgery was desirable, with one-third offering it and performing a median of 10 (i.q.r. 5–15) procedures annually. They were more likely to be senior (OR 1.35, 95 per cent c.i. 1.18 to 1.55; P < 0.001), with formal oncoplastic training (OR 4.80, 3.09 to 7.48; P < 0.001), and working in larger units (OR 1.18, 1.03 to 1.35; P = 0.018) with a free-flap (OR 1.62, 1.06 to 2.48; P = 0.025) or CWPF (OR 3.02, 1.87 to 4.89; P < 0.001) service available. In cluster and latent class analysis, none showed high cohesion with performance of CWPF surgery. Conclusion There is a discrepancy between perceived importance and availability of CWPF surgery, indicating that optimal training is needed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3