Costs of endovascular and open repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms

Author:

Gray Joanne1ORCID,McCarthy Andrew1ORCID,Samarakoon Dilupa1,McMeekin Peter1ORCID,Sharples Linda2,Sastry Priya3ORCID,Crawshaw Paul4,Bicknell Colin56ORCID,Large Stephen,Sharples Linda,Vale Luke,Sastry Priya,Bicknell Colin,Freeman Carol,Cook Andrew,Chiu Yi-Da,McCarthy Andrew,Gray Jo,McMeekin Peter,Vallabhaneni S Rao,Watson Nicky,Samarakoon Dilupa,Devine Thomas,Duffy Tom,Hughes Victoria,

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK

2. Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK

3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals , Oxford , UK

4. School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Law, Teesside University , Middlesbrough , UK

5. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College , London , UK

6. Imperial Vascular Unit, Imperial Healthcare NHS Trust , London , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms with either endovascular repair (TEVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR) represents major surgery, is costly and associated with significant complications. The aim of this study was to establish accurate costs of delivering TEVAR and OSR in a cohort of UK NHS patients suitable for open and endovascular treatment for the whole treatment pathway from admission and to discharge and 12-month follow-up. Methods A prospective study of UK NHS patients from 30 NHS vascular/cardiothoracic units in England aged ≥18, with distal arch/descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (CTAA) was undertaken. A multicentre prospective cost analysis of patients (recruited March 2014–July 2018, follow-up until July 2019) undergoing TEVAR or OSR was performed. Patients deemed suitable for open or endovascular repair were included in this study. A micro-costing approach was adopted. Results Some 115 patients having undergone TEVAR and 35 patients with OSR were identified. The mean (s.d.) cost of a TEVAR procedure was higher £26 536 (£9877) versus OSR £17 239 (£8043). Postoperative costs until discharge were lower for TEVAR £7484 (£7848) versus OSR £28 636 (£23 083). Therefore, total NHS costs from admission to discharge were lower for TEVAR £34 020 (£14 301), versus OSR £45 875 (£43 023). However, mean NHS costs for 12 months following the procedure were slightly higher for the TEVAR £5206 (£11 585) versus OSR £5039 (£11 994). Conclusions Surgical procedure costs were higher for TEVAR due to device costs. Total in-hospital costs were higher for OSR due to longer hospital and critical care stay. Follow-up costs over 12 months were slightly higher for TEVAR due to hospital readmissions.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Health Technology Assessment

Effective Treatments for Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

NHS

Department of Health

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3