Long-term patient-reported outcomes of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: population-based cohort study

Author:

Johnson Leigh1,White Paul2,Jeevan Ranjeet3,Browne John4,Gulliver-Clarke Carmel5,O’Donoghue Joe6,Mohiuddin Syed1,Hollingworth William1ORCID,Fairbrother Patricia7,MacKenzie Mairead7,Holcombe Chris8,Potter Shelley19ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School , Bristol , UK

2. Applied Statistics Group, University of the West of England , Bristol , UK

3. Department of Plastic Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust , Manchester , UK

4. School of Public Health, University College Cork , Cork , Ireland

5. Department of Breast Surgery, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Worthing , UK

6. Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne , UK

7. Independent Cancer Patients Voice (ICPV) , UK

8. Linda McCartney Centre, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital , Liverpool , UK

9. Bristol Breast Care Centre, Southmead Hospital , Bristol , UK

Abstract

Abstract Background Breast reconstruction is offered to improve quality of life for women after mastectomy for breast cancer, but information regarding the long-term patient-reported outcomes of different reconstruction procedures is currently lacking. The Brighter study aimed to evaluate long-term patient-reported outcomes after immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) in a population-based cohort. Methods Women who underwent mastectomy with IBR for breast cancer in England between 1 January 2008 and 31 March 2009 were identified from National Health Service Hospital Episode Statistics. Surviving women were invited to complete the BREAST-Q, EQ-5D-5L™, and ICECAP-A at least 12 years after the index procedure. Questionnaires were scored according to developers’ instructions and compared by IBR type. Results Some 1236 women underwent IBR; 343 (27.8 per cent) had 2-stage expander/implant, 630 (51.0 per cent) latissimus dorsi, and 263 (21.3 per cent) abdominal flap reconstructions, with a mean(s.d.) follow-up of 13.3(0.5) years. Women who underwent abdominal flap reconstruction reported higher scores in all BREAST-Q domains than those who had other procedures. These differences remained statistically significant and clinically meaningful after adjusting for age, ethnicity, geographical region, socioeconomic status, smoking, BMI, and complications. The greatest difference was seen in scores for satisfaction with breasts; women who had abdominal flap reconstructions reported scores that were 13.17 (95 per cent c.i. 9.48 to 16.87) points; P < 0.001) higher than those among women who had two-stage expander/implant procedures. Women who underwent latissimus dorsi reconstruction reported significantly more pain/discomfort on the EQ-5D-5L™, but no other differences between procedures were seen. Conclusion Long-term patient-reported outcomes are significantly better following abdominal flap reconstruction than other traditional procedure types. These findings should be shared with women considering IBR to help them make informed decisions about their surgical options.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Research for Patient Benefit Programme

NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

University Hospitals Bristol

Weston NHS Foundation Trust

University of Bristol

Department of Health

Care

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3