What constitutes evidence for over-the-counter medicines? A cross-sectional study of community pharmacists’ knowledge, attitude, and practices

Author:

De Chun Lik1,Anwar Mudassir1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Pharmacy, University of Otago , Dunedin , New Zealand

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of evidence-based medicine (EBM) with regard to over-the-counter (OTC) medicines among New Zealand community pharmacists. Methods A pre-piloted, self-administered online questionnaire was disseminated through email to 2788 registered community pharmacists. The questionnaire covered the aspects of knowledge, attitude and barriers towards EBM, and factors influencing pharmacists’ product recommendations. Responses were collected over 4 weeks in January 2021. Data were analysed using SPSS (version 26). Key findings A total of 326 responses were collected (11.7% response rate). Participants had an average knowledge score of 15.6 (out of 33). More than 50% had a favourable attitude towards EBM. Insufficient time (20.2%) and a lack of resources (16.4%) were reported as the major barriers to practicing EBM. The majority (72.8%) of participants believed that guideline recommendations were important for OTC recommendations; however, 44.9% would always use their own judgement. Recent graduates (P = 0.048) and pharmacists with a higher level of education (P = 0.00) scored significantly higher for knowledge. A higher knowledge score predicted ‘more favourable’ attitude towards EBM. Conclusions Deficiencies exist in community pharmacists’ EBM-related knowledge, attitude and practices. An educational intervention targeting older pharmacists is required since the relevant knowledge was found to be deteriorating with age.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3