Barriers to adverse drug reaction reporting in Malaysia: a narrative review based on theoretical domains framework

Author:

Shaik Rahmat Shakirin1,Karuppannan Mahmathi2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Pharmaceutical Care Branch, Pharmacy Practice and Development Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Malaysia

2. Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Cawangan Selangor, Puncak Alam Campus, Selangor, Malaysia

Abstract

Abstract Objectives This review aims to determine the common barriers to adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting in Malaysia based on theoretical domains framework (TDF). Methods Three online databases, PubMed (Medline), Scopus and Web of Science, were searched from 2000 to 2020 to identify related quantitative and qualitative studies. Key findings Eleven articles were reviewed – nine quantitative and two qualitative studies. Three domains from TDF were identified as the most common: (1) knowledge, (2) skills and (3) environmental context and resources. Lack of awareness of an ADR reporting system, lack of clinical and ADR knowledge and lack of time were identified as the main barriers. Additionally, assumption of healthcare professionals (HCPs) of ADR to be too insignificant or too well known and unavailability of the ADR form were also reported as barriers for reporting an ADR. Conclusions The findings from this narrative review could be useful for the policymakers in planning strategies at the national level to improve the reporting rate of ADR in Malaysia. It is necessary to promote and publicize pharmacovigilance activities and to enhance communication and engagement between the Malaysian ADR Advisory Committee and the HCPs and consumers. There is also a need to increase training and continuous education related to ADR and pharmacovigilance system and making ADR reporting compulsory for all HCPs.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3