The potential existence of ‘Small Individual Formulary’ in prescribing behaviour: a qualitative semi-structured interview study

Author:

Wang Yu1ORCID,Perri Matthew1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical and Administrative Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia , Athens, GA , USA

Abstract

Abstract Objectives There is a widely held but previously unsubstantiated belief that prescribers tend to consider and use a limited set of medications when making prescribing decisions. This study aimed to enhance understanding of the process of prescribing decision making in a real-world context. Methods Using constructivist grounded theory methodology, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 11 healthcare providers in Georgia state. The providers, most of whom are physicians of different specialties, shared their perspectives about prescribing decision making and their perceptions about using a limited set of medications in daily practice. Key findings Three themes emerged from the qualitative analysis: (1) prescribers recognized the existence of ‘small individual formularies’ and considered it helpful in simplifying prescribing decision making; (2) healthcare providers employed an algorithm to initiate and step up drug therapy for patients; (3) formulary and patient affordability played a vital role in prescribing. Conclusions Physicians and other prescribers consider and use a limited set of prescription drugs based on their internal prescribing behaviour algorithm. Strategies could be developed to help stakeholders use this information to improve medication use.

Funder

College of Pharmacy, University of Georgia

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous),Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Reference35 articles.

1. Paying for prescription drugs around the world: why is the US an outlier?;Sarnak;Issue Brief (Commonw Fund),2017

2. The high cost of prescription drugs in the United States origins and prospects for reform;Kesselheim;JAMA,2016

3. Physicians’ decision process for drug prescription and the impact of pharmaceutical marketing mix instruments;Campo;Health Mark Q,2005

4. Therapeutic reasoning: from hiatus to hypothetical model;Bissessur;J Eval Clin Pract,2009

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3