Affiliation:
1. Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
2. ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The clinical laboratory community has faced unprecedented challenges in responding to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Long-held assumptions about laboratory management have been reconsidered in light of these new circumstances.
Methods
Experience during the first 6 months of the COVID-19 pandemic at a clinical reference laboratory was reviewed in the context of several commonly held management principles to assess their relevance to clinical laboratory operations during a crisis.
Results
Management and operational ideas regarding different modes of communication, physical proximity and interaction, operating under a fixed budget, and maintaining a breadth of laboratory service offerings have been challenged during the COVID-19 pandemic. The importance of putting people first, maintaining collaboration, and providing effective leadership and communication throughout an organization have been highlighted.
Conclusions
The collaborative activities of highly interdependent teams and individuals have helped the clinical laboratory community respond to society’s needs in the COVID-19 crisis. Not all laboratory management principles apply equally well in the course of an international respiratory pandemic. When navigating crises, leaders need to distinguish situational management principles from those that are universal.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Reference5 articles.
1. Leadership in a (permanent) crisis;Heifetz;Harv Bus Rev.,2009
2. The science and fiction of meetings;Rogelberg;MIT Sloan Manag Rev.,2007
3. Stop wasting valuable time;Mankins;Harv Bus Rev.,2004
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献