A simple risk stratification model for prostate cancer using histopathologic findings of radical prostatectomy

Author:

Semba Remi12ORCID,Uchida Katsunori1,Hirokawa Yoshihumi1,Shiraishi Taizo2,Onishi Takehisa3,Sasaki Takeshi4,Inoue Takahiro4,Watanabe Masatoshi1,Miyamoto Hiroshi5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine , Mie , Japan

2. Department of Pathology, Kuwana City Medical Center , Mie , Japan

3. Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Ise Hospital , Mie , Japan

4. Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine , Mie , Japan

5. Departments of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Urology, University of Rochester Medical Center , Rochester, NY , US

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To develop a simple postoperative risk stratification based on histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy specimens. Methods This study included 3 cohorts of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of clinically localized prostate cancer: 1 derivation cohort (n = 432) and 2 validation cohorts (n = 506 and n = 720). First, a postoperative risk stratification model was developed in the derivation cohort using the factors extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement. Each of the first 3 factors was assigned 0 or 1 point for negative or positive results, respectively, and the sum of the points, ranging from 0 to 3, was scored. pN1 was not scored but was analyzed separately. Validation cohorts were then used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the model. Additionally, we compared the model with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score. Results Because the log-rank test showed no statistically significant differences between scores 1 vs 2 or score 3 vs pN1 in the derivation cohort, the following 3-level risk stratification was created: low risk (score 0), intermediate risk (score 1-2), and high risk (score 3 or pN1). There were statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival between any of 2 groups of 3-level risk stratification. This model similarly worked in both validation cohorts. The C indexes for the model were higher than those for the CAPRA score. Conclusions This simple postoperative risk stratification model, based on radical prostatectomy findings, has a prognostic impact that has been validated in a multicenter population.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3