Comparison of Tissue Molecular Biomarker Testing Turnaround Times and Concordance Between Standard of Care and the Biocartis Idylla Platform in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Author:

Tsongalis Gregory J12,Al Turkmani M Rabie12,Suriawinata Michael12,Babcock Michael J3,Mitchell Kristi3,Ding Yi4,Scicchitano Lisa4,Tira Adrian5,Buckingham Lela5,Atkinson Sara6,Lax Amy6,Aisner Dara L7,Davies Kurtis D7,Wood Holly N7,O’Neill Stacey S8,Levine Edward A9,Sequeira Judy10,Harada Shuko11ORCID,DeFrank Gina11,Paluri Ravikumar12,Tan Bradford A13,Colabella Heather13,Snead Christopher14,Cruz-Correa Marcia15,Ramirez Virginia15,Rojas Arnaldo15,Huang Huiya16ORCID,Mackinnon Alexander C16,Garcia Fernando U17,Cavone Sharon M17,Elfahal Mutasim18,Abel Gyorgy18,Vasef Mohammad A19,Judd Andrew19,Linder Mark W20,Alkhateeb Khaled20,Skinner William L21,Boccia Ralph22,Patel Kashyap23

Affiliation:

1. Clinical Genomics and Advanced Technology (CGAT) Laboratory, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Health System, Lebanon, NH

2. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

3. Bioinformatics & Molecular Pathology, Dahl-Chase Diagnostic Services & Pathology Associates, Bangor, ME

4. Diagnostic Medicine Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA

5. Department of Pathology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

6. Department of Cytology, Cone Health Moses Cone Hospital, Greensboro, NC

7. Colorado Molecular Correlates Laboratory (CMOCO), Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora

8. Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

9. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

10. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Comprehensive Care and Research Center, Cancer Treatment Centers of America Atlanta, Newnan, GA

11. Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham

12. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham

13. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Comprehensive Care and Research Center, Cancer Treatment Centers of America Chicago, Zion, IL

14. CHRISTUS Cancer Treatment Center, Shreveport, LA

15. Pan American Center for Oncology Trials, Oncologic Hospital, Puerto Rico Medical Center, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico

16. Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee

17. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Comprehensive Care and Research Center, Cancer Treatment Centers of America Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA

18. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, MA

19. Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque

20. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Louisville Hospital, Louisville, KY

21. Mercy Health–Paducah Medical Oncology and Hematology, Paducah, KY

22. The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Bethesda, MD

23. Carolina Blood and Cancer Care Associates, PA, Rock Hill, SC

Abstract

Abstract Objectives Management of colorectal cancer warrants mutational analysis of KRAS/NRAS when considering anti–epidermal growth factor receptor therapy and BRAF testing for prognostic stratification. In this multicenter study, we compared a fully integrated, cartridge-based system to standard-of-care assays used by participating laboratories. Methods Twenty laboratories enrolled 874 colorectal cancer cases between November 2017 and December 2018. Testing was performed on the Idylla automated system (Biocartis) using the KRAS and NRAS-BRAF cartridges (research use only) and results compared with in-house standard-of-care testing methods. Results There were sufficient data on 780 cases to measure turnaround time compared with standard assays. In-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) had an average testing turnaround time of 5.6 days, send-out PCR of 22.5 days, in-house Sanger sequencing of 14.7 days, send-out Sanger of 17.8 days, in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) of 12.5 days, and send-out NGS of 20.0 days. Standard testing had an average turnaround time of 11 days. Idylla average time to results was 4.9 days with a range of 0.4 to 13.5 days. Conclusions The described cartridge-based system offers rapid and reliable testing of clinically actionable mutation in colorectal cancer specimens directly from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Its simplicity and ease of use compared with other molecular techniques make it suitable for routine clinical laboratory testing.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3