Abstract
Abstract
Trade-offs between attributes are common when making product choices. Prior research suggests that consumers tend to avoid the extremes and opt for the middle options when they make a trade-off decision between two key product attributes (e.g., tastiness and healthiness of food items) in one step. In this research, we examine how consumers make such trade-off decisions in a two-step choice process in which consumers first choose between product categories competing on two key attributes and then make a final choice within the chosen category. In three studies, we show that when holding the actual choice options unchanged, consumers are more likely to make a more extreme final choice, prioritizing a single attribute rather than compromising when they follow a two-step choice process instead of a one-step process.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Marketing,Economics and Econometrics,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Anthropology,Business and International Management
Reference52 articles.
1. Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context;Amir;Journal of Marketing Research,2008
2. How Actions Create—Not Just Reveal—Preferences;Ariely;Trends in Cognitive Sciences,2008
3. Commitment and Behavior Change: Evidence from the Field;Baca-Motes;Journal of Consumer Research,2013
4. Correlation, Conflict and Choice;Bettman;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,1993
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献