Spitzer and Herschel studies of dust in supernova remnants in the Small Magellanic Cloud

Author:

Matsuura Mikako1ORCID,Ayley Victoria1,Chawner Hannah12,Filipović M D3,Reid Warren345,Priestley F D1,Rigby Andy1ORCID,Barlow M J6ORCID,Gomez Haley E1

Affiliation:

1. School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University , The Parade, Cardiff CF24 3AA, UK

2. School of Chemistry, University of Bristol , Queens Road, Bristol, BS8 1QU, UK

3. Western Sydney University , Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, NSW 2751, Australia

4. School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia

5. Observatory Hill Waitoki , 130 Dormer Rd, RD2 Helensville, 0875, New Zealand

6. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London , Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK

Abstract

ABSTRACT With the entire Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) mapped by the Spitzer Space Telescope and Herschel Space Observatory, we were able to search 8–250 $\mu$m images in order to identify infrared (IR) emission associated with SMC supernova remnants (SNRs). A valid detection had to correspond with known X-ray, H α, and radio emission from the SNRs. From the 24 known SNRs, we made five positive detections with another five possible detections. Two detections are associated with pulsars or pulsar wind nebula, and another three detections are part of the extended nebulous emission from the SNRs. We modelled dust emission where fast moving electrons are predicted to collide and heat dust grains which then radiate in IR. With known distance (62.44 ± 0.47 kpc), measured SNR sizes, electron densities, temperatures from X-ray emission as well as hydrogen densities, the modelling of SMC SNRs is straightforward. If the higher range of hydrogen and electron densities were to be accepted, we would expect almost all SMC SNRs to be detected in the IR, at least at 24 $\mu$m, but the actual detection rate is only 25 per cent. One possible and common explanation for this discrepancy is that small grains have been destroyed by the SNRs shockwave. However, within the uncertainties of hydrogen and electron densities, we find that IR dust emission can be explained reasonably well, without invoking dust destruction. There is no conclusive evidence that SNRs destroy swept-up ISM dust.

Funder

ESA

NASA

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of Technology

European Southern Observatory

ESO

STFC

European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3