The black hole masses of high-redshift QSOs

Author:

King Andrew123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Leicester , Leicester LE1 7RH , UK

2. Astronomical Institute Anton Pannekoek, University of Amsterdam , Science Park 904, NL-1098 XH Amsterdam , The Netherlands

3. Leiden Observatory, Leiden University , Niels Bohrweg 2, NL-2333 CA Leiden , The Netherlands

Abstract

ABSTRACT Observations of high-redshift quasars frequently promote suggestions of large black hole masses, whose presence so early in cosmic time is not easily explicable. I consider the parallel with ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) – now known to be stellar-mass black hole (and neutron star) binaries apparently radiating far above their Eddington luminosities LEdd. The true luminosity in ULXs is actually only of order LEdd, for stellar-mass accretors, but has a very anisotropic (‘beamed’) component, plus a near-isotropic component of similar luminosity but much lower specific intensity. Observers viewing ULXs from within the beam but assuming spherical symmetry deduce a luminosity ≫LEdd. These features appear because the accretors are fed mass at highly super-Eddington rates, most of it expelled in high-speed (v > 0.2c) outflows from the accretion disc. I show that in similarly beamed AGN, emission-line properties would be essentially the same as in unbeamed sources, but standard virial mass indicators unusable because velocity widths are dominated by the outflows, not bound motions about the black holes. In an ensemble of this kind the apparently most luminous systems are always the most distant, but have the lowest black hole masses. Interpreting observations of this ensemble without knowing that they are beamed leads instead to very high black hole mass estimates. The analogy with ULXs therefore suggests that high-redshift quasars might actually have central black hole masses which could have grown from stellar values within the lookback time. I consider how one might test these ideas observationally.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3