Fundamental differences in the radio properties of red and blue quasars: evolution strongly favoured over orientation

Author:

Klindt L1ORCID,Alexander D M1ORCID,Rosario D J1ORCID,Lusso E1ORCID,Fotopoulou S1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Department of Physics, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, UK

Abstract

Abstract A minority of the optically selected quasar population are red at optical wavelengths due to the presence of dust along the line of sight. A key focus of many red quasar studies is to understand their relationship with the overall quasar population: are they blue quasars observed at a (slight) inclination angle or do they represent a transitional phase in the evolution of quasars? Identifying fundamental differences between red and blue quasars is key to discriminate between these two paradigms. To robustly explore this, we have uniformly selected quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey with mid-infrared counterparts, carefully controlling for luminosity and redshift effects. We take a novel approach to distinguish between colour-selected quasars in the redshift range of 0.2 < z < 2.4 by constructing redshift-sensitive g* − i* colour cuts. From cross-matching this sample to the Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-centimeters (FIRST) survey, we have found a factor ≈ 3 larger fraction of radio-detected red quasars with respect to that of blue quasars. Through a visual inspection of the FIRST images and an assessment of the radio luminosities (rest-frame ${L_{\rm 1.4\, GHz}}$ and ${L_{\rm 1.4\, GHz}}/{L_{\rm 6\mu m}}$), we find that the radio-detection excess for red quasars is primarily due to compact and radio-faint systems (around the radio-quiet – radio-loud threshold). We show that our results rule out orientation as the origin for the differences between red and blue quasars and argue that they provide broad agreement with an evolutionary model.

Funder

Science and Technology Facilities Council

European Union

Swiss National Science Foundation

Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

National Science Foundation

U.S. Department of Energy

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Max Planck Society

Higher Education Funding Council for England

American Museum of Natural History

Universität Basel

University of Cambridge

Case Western Reserve University

University of Chicago

Drexel University

Institute for Advanced Study

Johns Hopkins University

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Los Alamos National Laboratory

New Mexico State University

Ohio State University

University of Pittsburgh

University of Portsmouth

Princeton University

U.S. Naval Observatory

University of Washington

University of California

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of Technology

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3