Free-floating ‘planets’ in the macrolensed quasar Q2237+0305

Author:

Tuntsov Artem V1,Lewis Geraint F2ORCID,Walker Mark A1

Affiliation:

1. Manly Astrophysics , 15/41-42 East Esplanade, Manly, NSW 2095 , Australia

2. Sydney Institute for Astronomy, School of Physics A28, The University of Sydney , Camperdown, NSW 2006 , Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT It has been claimed that the variability of field quasars resembles gravitational lensing by a large cosmological population of free-floating planets with mass $\sim\!\! 10\ {\rm M}_{\oplus }$. However, Galactic photometric monitoring experiments, on the other hand, exclude a large population of such planetary-mass gravitational lenses. These apparently contradictory pieces of evidence can be reconciled if the objects under consideration have a mean column density that lies between the critical column densities for gravitational lensing in these two contexts. Dark matter in that form is known to be weakly collisional, so a core develops in galaxy halo density profiles, and a preferred model has already been established. Here, we consider what such a model implies for Q2237+0305, which is the best-studied example of a quasar that is strongly lensed by an intervening galaxy. We construct microlensing magnification maps appropriate to the four macro-images of the quasar – all of which are seen through the bulge of the galaxy. Each of these maps exhibits a caustic network arising from the stars, plus many small, isolated caustics arising from the free-floating ‘planets’ in the lens galaxy. The ‘planets’ have little influence on the magnification histograms but a large effect on the statistics of the magnification gradients. We compare our predictions to the published Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE) photometry of Q2237+0305 and find that these data are consistent with the presence of the hypothetical ‘planets’. However, the evidence is relatively weak because the OGLE data set is not well suited to testing our predictions and requires low-pass filtering for this application. New data from a large, space-based telescope are desirable to address this issue.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3