A measurement of the Hubble constant from Type II supernovae

Author:

de Jaeger T1ORCID,Stahl B E12ORCID,Zheng W1,Filippenko A V13,Riess A G45,Galbany L6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Astronomy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

2. Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

3. Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA

4. Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

5. Department of Physics & Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

6. Departamento de Física Teórica y del Cosmos, Universidad de Granada, E-18071 Granada, Spain

Abstract

ABSTRACT Progressive increases in the precision of the Hubble-constant measurement via Cepheid-calibrated Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) have shown a discrepancy of ∼4.4σ with the current value inferred from Planck satellite measurements of the cosmic microwave background radiation and the standard $\Lambda $cold dark matter (ΛCDM) cosmological model. This disagreement does not appear to be due to known systematic errors and may therefore be hinting at new fundamental physics. Although all of the current techniques have their own merits, further improvement in constraining the Hubble constant requires the development of as many independent methods as possible. In this work, we use SNe II as standardisable candles to obtain an independent measurement of the Hubble constant. Using seven SNe II with host-galaxy distances measured from Cepheid variables or the tip of the red giant branch, we derive H$_0= 75.8^{+5.2}_{-4.9}$ km s−1 Mpc−1 (statistical errors only). Our value favours that obtained from the conventional distance ladder (Cepheids + SNe Ia) and exhibits a difference of 8.4 km s−1 Mpc−1 from the Planck + ΛCDM value. Adding an estimate of the systematic errors (2.8 km s−1 Mpc−1) changes the ∼1.7σ discrepancy with Planck +ΛCDM to ∼1.4σ. Including the systematic errors and performing a bootstrap simulation, we confirm that the local H0 value exceeds the value from the early Universe with a confidence level of 95 per cent. As in this work, we only exchange SNe II for SNe Ia to measure extragalactic distances, we demonstrate that there is no evidence that SNe Ia are the source of the H0 tension.

Funder

NSF

Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science

Horizon 2020

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

FEDER

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

STFC

National Research Council Canada

CONICYT

Australian Research Council

CONICET

NED

Jet Propulsion Laboratory

California Institute of Technology

U.S. Department of Energy

University of Illinois

University of Chicago

Ohio State University

MINECO

Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa

European Research Council

Seventh Framework Programme

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Tale of Many H0;Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics;2024-09-13

2. ΛCDM Tensions: Localising Missing Physics through Consistency Checks;Universe;2024-07-23

3. Cosmological perturbation theory in metric-affine gravity;Physical Review D;2024-07-09

4. Unraveling the link between Type II supernova luminosity and host galaxy velocity dispersion;Astronomische Nachrichten;2024-06-18

5. Radial Tully–Fisher relation and the local variance of Hubble parameter;Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society;2024-06-12

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3