Examining NHD versus QHD in the GCM THOR with non-grey radiative transfer for the hot Jupiter regime

Author:

Noti Pascal A12ORCID,Lee Elspeth K H1ORCID,Deitrick Russell3ORCID,Hammond Mark4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Center for Space and Habitability, Universität Bern , Gesellschaftsstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern , Switzerland

2. Physikalisches Institut, Universität Bern , Sidlerstrasse 5, CH-3012 Bern , Switzerland

3. School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Bob Wright Centre A405, University of Victoria , PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2 , Canada

4. Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Clarendon Laboratory , Oxford, OX1 3PU , United Kingdom

Abstract

ABSTRACT Global circulation models (GCMs) play an important role in contemporary investigations of exoplanet atmospheres. Different GCMs evolve various sets of dynamical equations, which can result in obtaining different atmospheric properties between models. In this study, we investigate the effect of different dynamical equation sets on the atmospheres of hot Jupiter exoplanets. We compare GCM simulations using the quasi-primitive dynamical equations (QHD) and the deep Navier-Stokes equations (NHD) in the GCM THOR. We utilize a two-stream non-grey ‘picket-fence’ scheme to increase the realism of the radiative transfer calculations. We perform GCM simulations covering a wide parameter range grid of system parameters in the population of exoplanets. Our results show significant differences between simulations with the NHD and QHD equation sets at lower gravity, higher rotation rates, or at higher irradiation temperatures. The chosen parameter range shows the relevance of choosing dynamical equation sets dependent on system and planetary properties. Our results show the climate states of hot Jupiters seem to be very diverse, where exceptions to prograde superrotation can often occur. Overall, our study shows the evolution of different climate states that arise just due to different selections of Navier-Stokes equations and approximations. We show the divergent behaviour of approximations used in GCMs for Earth but applied for non Earth-like planets.

Funder

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Canadian Space Agency

European Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3