An improved Tully–Fisher estimate of H0

Author:

Boubel Paula1,Colless Matthew1ORCID,Said Khaled2ORCID,Staveley-Smith Lister3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Research School of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Australian National University, Mount Stromlo Observatory , Canberra, ACT 2611 , Australia

2. School of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072 , Australia

3. International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research (ICRAR), University of Western Australia , 35 Stirling Hwy, Crawley, WA 6009 , Australia

Abstract

ABSTRACT We propose an improved comprehensive method for determining the Hubble constant ($H_0$) using the Tully–Fisher relation. By fitting a peculiar velocity model in conjunction with the Tully–Fisher relation, all available data can be used to derive self-consistent Tully–Fisher parameters. In comparison to previous approaches, our method offers several improvements: it can be readily generalized to different forms of the Tully–Fisher relation and its intrinsic scatter; it uses a peculiar velocity model to predict distances more accurately; it can account for all selection effects; it uses the entire data set to fit the Tully–Fisher relation; and it is fully self-consistent. The Tully–Fisher relation zero-point is calibrated using the subset of galaxies with distances from absolute distance indicators. We demonstrate this method on the Cosmicflows-4 catalogue i-band and $W1$-band Tully–Fisher samples and show that the uncertainties from fitting the Tully–Fisher relation amount to only 0.2 km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$. Using all available absolute distance calibrators, we obtain $H_0=73.3$ $\pm$ 2.1 (stat) $\pm$ 3.5 (sys) km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$, where the statistical uncertainty is dominated by the small number of galaxies with absolute distance estimates. The substantial systematic uncertainty reflects inconsistencies between various zero-point calibrations of the Cepheid period–luminosity relation, the tip of the red giant branch standard candle, and the Type Ia supernova standard candle. However, given a reliable set of absolute distance calibrators, our method promises enhanced precision in $H_0$ measurements from large new Tully–Fisher samples such as the WALLABY survey.

Funder

Royal Society

University of Oxford

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3