H i constraints from the cross-correlation of eBOSS galaxies and Green Bank Telescope intensity maps

Author:

Wolz Laura1,Pourtsidou Alkistis2ORCID,Masui Kiyoshi W34,Chang Tzu-Ching567,Bautista Julian E89ORCID,Müller Eva-Maria10,Avila Santiago1112,Bacon David9ORCID,Percival Will J131415,Cunnington Steven2ORCID,Anderson Chris16,Chen Xuelei17ORCID,Kneib Jean-Paul18,Li Yi-Chao19ORCID,Liao Yu-Wei7,Pen Ue-Li20,Peterson Jeffrey B21,Rossi Graziano22,Schneider Donald P2324,Yadav Jaswant25,Zhao Gong-Bo917

Affiliation:

1. Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK

2. School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, UK

3. MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

4. Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

5. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA

6. California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA

7. Academia Sinica Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan

8. CNRS/IN2P3, CPPM, Aix Marseille Univ, 13009 Marseille, France

9. Institute of Cosmology & Gravitation, University of Portsmouth, Dennis Sciama Building, Portsmouth PO1 3FX, UK

10. Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK

11. Departamento de Física Teórica, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain

12. Instituto de Física Teorica UAM-CSIC, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, E-28049 Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain

13. Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada

14. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada

15. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. North, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5, Canada

16. Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin Madison, 1150 University Ave, Madison, WI 53703, USA

17. National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

18. Institute of Physics, Laboratory of Astrophysics, Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne (EPFL), Observatoire de Sauverny, CH-1290 Versoix, Switzerland

19. Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town 7535, South Africa

20. Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George St., Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada

21. Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

22. Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Sejong University, 209, Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, South Korea

23. Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

24. Institute for Gravitation and the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA

25. Central University of Haryana, Jant-Pali, Mahendergarh 123031, India

Abstract

ABSTRACT We present the joint analysis of Neutral Hydrogen (H i) Intensity Mapping observations with three galaxy samples: the Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) and Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) samples from the eBOSS survey, and the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey sample. The H i intensity maps are Green Bank Telescope observations of the redshifted $21\rm cm$ emission on $100 \, {\rm deg}^2$ covering the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1.0. We process the data by separating and removing the foregrounds present in the radio frequencies with FastI ICA. We verify the quality of the foreground separation with mock realizations, and construct a transfer function to correct for the effects of foreground removal on the H i signal. We cross-correlate the cleaned H i data with the galaxy samples and study the overall amplitude as well as the scale dependence of the power spectrum. We also qualitatively compare our findings with the predictions by a semianalytical galaxy evolution simulation. The cross-correlations constrain the quantity $\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm opt}}$ at an effective scale keff, where $\Omega _\rm {H\,\small {I}}$ is the H  i density fraction, $b_\rm {H\,\small {I}}$ is the H i bias, and $r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm opt}}$ the galaxy–hydrogen correlation coefficient, which is dependent on the H  i content of the optical galaxy sample. At $k_{\rm eff}=0.31 \, h\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$ we find $\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm Wig}} = [0.58 \pm 0.09 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.05 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$ for GBT-WiggleZ, $\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm ELG}} = [0.40 \pm 0.09 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.04 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$ for GBT-ELG, and $\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm LRG}} = [0.35 \pm 0.08 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.03 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$ for GBT-LRG, at z ≃ 0.8. We also report results at $k_{\rm eff}=0.24$ and $k_{\rm eff}=0.48 \, h\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$. With little information on H i parameters beyond our local Universe, these are amongst the most precise constraints on neutral hydrogen density fluctuations in an underexplored redshift range.

Funder

STFC

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 54 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3