Cosmological parameters estimated from peculiar velocity–density comparisons: calibrating 2M++

Author:

Hollinger Amber M12,Hudson Michael J123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo , 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 , Canada

2. Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, University of Waterloo , 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1 , Canada

3. Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics , 31 Caroline St. North, Waterloo, ON N2L 2Y5 , Canada

Abstract

ABSTRACT Cosmological parameters can be measured by comparing peculiar velocities with those predicted from a galaxy density field. Previous work has tested the accuracy of this approach with N-body simulations, but generally on idealized mock galaxy surveys. However, systematic biases may arise solely due to survey selection effects such as flux-limited samples, edge-effects, and complications due to the obscuration of the Galactic plane. In this work, we explore the impact of each of these effects individually as well as collectively using the semi-analytic models from numerical simulations to generate mock catalogues that mimic the 2M++ density field. We find the reconstruction and analysis methods used for our 2M++ mocks produce a value of fσ8 that is biased high by a factor 1.04 ± 0.01 compared to the true value. Moreover, a cosmic volume matching that of 2M++ has a cosmic variance uncertainty in fσ8 of $\sim 5~{{\ \rm per\ cent}}$. The systematic bias is a function of distance: it is unbiased close to the origin but is biased slightly high for distances in the range 100–180 h−1 Mpc. Correcting for this small bias, we find that recent peculiar velocity samples yield $f\sigma _8^{\textrm {lin}} = 0.362\pm 0.023$, a value that is in tension with the extrapolations from cosmic microwave background measurements. The predicted peculiar velocities from 2M++ have an error of 170 km s−1 that slowly increases with distance, exceeding 200 km s−1 only at distances of 180–200 h−1Mpc. Finally, the residual bulk flow speeds found in previous work are shown to be not in conflict with those expected in the Λ cold dark matter model.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3