Some statistical remarks on GRBs jointly detected by Fermi and Swift satellites

Author:

Pinter Sandor12ORCID,Balazs Lajos G23,Bagoly Zsolt14,Toth L Viktor25ORCID,Racz Istvan I1ORCID,Horvath Istvan1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Natural Science, University of Public Service , H-1101 Budapest , Hungary

2. Department of Astronomy, Eötvös University , H-1117 Budapest , Hungary

3. Konkoly Observatory, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences , H-1121 Budapest , Hungary

4. Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös University , H-1117 Budapest , Hungary

5. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen , H-4032 Debrecen , Hungary

Abstract

ABSTRACT We made statistical analysis of the Fermi GBM and Swift BAT observational material, accumulated over 15 yr. We studied how GRB parameters (T90 duration, fluence, and peak flux) that were observed by only one satellite differ from those observed by both. In the latter case, it was possible to directly compare the values of the parameters that both satellites measured. The GRBs measured by both satellites were identified using the k-nearest neighbours algorithm in Euclidean distance. In the parameter space we determined the direction in which the jointly detected GRBs differ most from those detected by only one of the instruments using linear discriminant analyses. To get the strength of the relationship between the parameters obtained from the GBM and BAT, a canonical correlation was performed. The GBM and BAT T90 distributions were fitted with a linear combination of lognormal functions. The optimal number of such functions required for fit is two for GBM and three for BAT. Contrary to the widely accepted view, we found that the number of lognormal functions required for fitting the observed distribution of GRB durations does not allow us to deduce the number of central engine types responsible for GRBs.

Funder

OTKA

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3