Sudden and steady orbital period changes across six classical Nova Eruptions: the end of hibernation and two serious challenges for the magnetic braking model of cataclysmic variable evolution

Author:

Schaefer Bradley E1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA

Abstract

ABSTRACT I report on two new measures of the sudden change in the orbital period (P) across the nova eruption (ΔP) and the steady period change in quiescence ($\dot{P}$) for classical novae (CNe) RR Pic and HR Del, bringing a total of six such measures for CNe, all in a final report of my large and long observing program. The fractional changes (ΔP/P) in parts-per-million (ppm) are −290.71 ± 0.28 (QZ Aur), −472.1 ± 4.8 (HR Del), −4.46 ± 0.03 (DQ Her), +39.6 ± 0.5 (BT Mon), −2003.7 ± 0.9 (RR Pic), and −273 ± 61 (V1017 Sgr). These results are in stark opposition to the Hibernation Model for the evolution of cataclysmic variables (CVs), which requires ΔP/P> + 1000 ppm to get the required drop in the accretion rate to produce hibernation. The hibernation model cannot be salvaged in any way. My program has also measured the first long-term $\dot{P}$ for CNe, with −2.84 ± 0.22 (QZ Aur), +4.0 ± 0.9 (HR Del), +0.00 ± 0.02 (DQ Her), −2.3 ± 0.1 (BT Mon), and +1.25 ± 0.01 (RR Pic) in units of 10−11 d per cycle. These can be directly compared to the predictions of the magnetic braking model, where the long-term average $\dot{P}$ is a single universal function of P. The measured values are +5.3, −94, 0.00, +6.9, and −190 times that predicted by the model, so the predictions are always greatly wrong. Further, the effects of the ΔP averaged over the eruption cycle are usually much larger than the magnetic braking effects. To get a realistic model of CV evolution, we must add the physics of the ΔP and $\dot{P}$ variations.

Funder

Robert Martin Ayers Sciences Fund

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3