Galaxy cluster aperture masses are more robust to baryonic effects than 3D halo masses

Author:

Debackere Stijn N B1ORCID,Hoekstra Henk1ORCID,Schaye Joop1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Leiden Observatory, Leiden University , PO Box 9513, NL-2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands

Abstract

ABSTRACT Systematic uncertainties in the mass measurement of galaxy clusters limit the cosmological constraining power of future surveys that will detect more than 105 clusters. Previously, we argued that aperture masses can be inferred more accurately and precisely than 3D masses without loss of cosmological constraining power. Here, we use the Baryons and Haloes of Massive Systems (BAHAMAS) cosmological, hydrodynamical simulations to show that aperture masses are also less sensitive to changes in mass caused by galaxy formation processes. For haloes with $m_\mathrm{200m,dmo} \gt 10^{14} \, h^{-1} \, \mathrm{M_\odot }$, binned by their 3D halo mass, baryonic physics affects aperture masses and 3D halo masses similarly when measured within apertures similar to the halo virial radius, reaching a maximum reduction of $\approx 3 \, \mathrm{per\, cent}$. For lower mass haloes, $10^{13.5} \lt m_\mathrm{200m,dmo} / h^{-1} \, \mathrm{M_\odot }\lt 10^{14}$, and aperture sizes $\sim 1 \, h^{-1} \, \mathrm{cMpc}$, representative of weak lensing observations, the aperture mass is consistently reduced less ($\lesssim 5 \, \mathrm{per\, cent}$) than the 3D halo mass ($\lesssim 10 \, \mathrm{per\, cent}$ for m200m). The halo mass reduction evolves only slightly, by up to 2 $\mathrm{per\, centage}$ points, between redshift 0.25 and 1 for both the aperture mass and m200m. Varying the simulated feedback strength so the mean simulated hot gas fraction covers the observed scatter inferred from X-ray observations, we find that the aperture mass is consistently less biased than the 3D halo mass, by up to $2 \,$$\mathrm{per\, centage}$ points at $m_\mathrm{200m,dmo} = 10^{14} \, h^{-1} \, \mathrm{M_\odot }$. Therefore, aperture mass calibrations provide a fruitful path to reduce the sensitivity of future cluster surveys to systematic uncertainties.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Space and Planetary Science,Astronomy and Astrophysics

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3