The interpretation of CHA2DS2-VASc score components in clinical practice: a joint survey by the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee, the EHRA Young Electrophysiologists, the Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals, and the European Society of Cardiology Council on Stroke

Author:

Zhang Juqian1,Lenarczyk Radoslaw2,Marin Francisco3,Malaczynska-Rajpold Katarzyna4,Kosiuk Jedrzej5,Doehner Wolfram67,Van Gelder Isabelle C8,Lee Geraldine9,Hendriks Jeroen M1011,Lip Gregory Y H112ORCID,Potpara Tatjana S1314ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK

2. First Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Silesian Centre for Heart Disease, Curie-Sklodowskiej Str 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland

3. Department of Cardiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-Arrixaca, CIBERCV, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

4. Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

5. Helios Hospital Köthen, Köthen, Germany

6. Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, and Department of Cardiology (Virchow Klinikum), and Department of Cardiology (Virchow Klinikum), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Berlin, Germany

7. Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

8. Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

9. Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, Kings College London, London, UK

10. Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

11. Department of Cardiology, Centre for Heart Rhythm Disorders, University of Adelaide, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

12. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

13. School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

14. Cardiology Clinic, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Visegradska 26, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia

Abstract

Abstract This European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Scientific Initiatives Committee, EHRA Young Electrophysiologists, Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professionals, and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Council on Stroke joint survey aimed to assess the interpretation of the CHA2DS2-VASc score components and preferred resources for calculating the score. Of 439 respondents, most were general cardiologists (46.7%) or electrophysiologists (EPs) (42.1%). The overall adherence to the ESC-defined scoring criteria was good. Most variation was observed in the interpretation of the significance of left ventricular ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide in the scoring for the ‘C’ component, as well as the ‘one-off high reading of blood pressure’ to score on the ‘H’ component. Greater confidence was expressed in scoring the ‘H’ component (72.3%) compared with the ‘C’ (46.2%) and ‘V’ (45.9%) components. Respondents mainly relied on their recall for the scoring of CHA2DS2-VASc score (64.2%). The three most favoured referencing resources varied among different professionals, with pharmacists and physicians relying mainly on memory or web/mobile app, whereas nurses favoured using a web/mobile app followed by memory or guidelines/protocol. In conclusion, this survey revealed overall good adherence to the correct definition of each component in scoring of the ‘C’, ‘H’, and ‘V’ elements of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, although the variation in their interpretations warrants further clarifications. The preferred referencing resources to calculate the score varied among different healthcare professionals. Guideline education to healthcare professionals and updated and unified online/mobile scoring tools are suggested to improve the accuracy in scoring the CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS;Kirchhof;Europace

2. Global epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: an increasing epidemic and public health challenge;Lippi;Int J Stroke,2020

3. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS);Hindricks;Eur Heart J,2020

4. Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: CHEST guideline and expert panel report;Lip;Chest,2018

5. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review;Borre;Thromb Haemost,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3