Hybrid machine learning to localize atrial flutter substrates using the surface 12-lead electrocardiogram

Author:

Luongo Giorgio1ORCID,Vacanti Gaetano2,Nitzke Vincent1,Nairn Deborah1,Nagel Claudia1,Kabiri Diba2,Almeida Tiago P3,Soriano Diogo C4,Rivolta Massimo W5,Ng Ghulam André3,Dössel Olaf1ORCID,Luik Armin2ORCID,Sassi Roberto5,Schmitt Claus2,Loewe Axel1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Biomedical Engineering (IBT), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Fritz-Haber-Weg 1, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany

2. Medizinische Klinik IV, Städtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Moltkestrasse, 90, 76182, Karlsruhe, Germany

3. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, UK

4. Engineering, Modelling and Applied Social Sciences Centre, ABC Federal University, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil

5. Dipartimento di Informatica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

Abstract

Abstract Aims Atrial flutter (AFlut) is a common re-entrant atrial tachycardia driven by self-sustainable mechanisms that cause excitations to propagate along pathways different from sinus rhythm. Intra-cardiac electrophysiological mapping and catheter ablation are often performed without detailed prior knowledge of the mechanism perpetuating AFlut, likely prolonging the procedure time of these invasive interventions. We sought to discriminate the AFlut location [cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent (CTI), peri-mitral, and other left atrium (LA) AFlut classes] with a machine learning-based algorithm using only the non-invasive signals from the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Methods and results Hybrid 12-lead ECG dataset of 1769 signals was used (1424 in silico ECGs, and 345 clinical ECGs from 115 patients—three different ECG segments over time were extracted from each patient corresponding to single AFlut cycles). Seventy-seven features were extracted. A decision tree classifier with a hold-out classification approach was trained, validated, and tested on the dataset randomly split after selecting the most informative features. The clinical test set comprised 38 patients (114 clinical ECGs). The classifier yielded 76.3% accuracy on the clinical test set with a sensitivity of 89.7%, 75.0%, and 64.1% and a positive predictive value of 71.4%, 75.0%, and 86.2% for CTI, peri-mitral, and other LA class, respectively. Considering majority vote of the three segments taken from each patient, the CTI class was correctly classified at 92%. Conclusion Our results show that a machine learning classifier relying only on non-invasive signals can potentially identify the location of AFlut mechanisms. This method could aid in planning and tailoring patient-specific AFlut treatments.

Funder

Marie Sklodowska-Curie

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg through the Research Seed Capital (RiSC) programme

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

British Heart Foundation Programme Grant

Medical Research Council DPFS Grant

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population;Granada;J Am Coll Cardiol,2000

2. 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society;Page;Circulation,2016

3. Atrial flutter, typical and atypical: a review;Cosío;Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev,2017

4. A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases; a Statement from a Joint Expert Group from The Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology;Saoudi;Eur Heart J,2001

5. Atrial electroanatomic remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation;Pappone;Circulation,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3