Prediction models for atrial fibrillation applicable in the community: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Himmelreich Jelle C L1ORCID,Veelers Lieke1,Lucassen Wim A M1,Schnabel Renate B2,Rienstra Michiel3ORCID,van Weert Henk C P M1,Harskamp Ralf E1

Affiliation:

1. Department of General Practice, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands

2. Department of General and Interventional Cardiology, University Heart Center Hamburg/German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Luebeck, Martinistrasse 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany

3. Department of Cardiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia associated with an increased stroke risk. The use of multivariable prediction models could result in more efficient primary AF screening by selecting at-risk individuals. We aimed to determine which model may be best suitable for increasing efficiency of future primary AF screening efforts. Methods and results We performed a systematic review on multivariable models derived, validated, and/or augmented for AF prediction in community cohorts using Pubmed, Embase, and CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) through 1 August 2019. We performed meta-analysis of model discrimination with the summary C-statistic as the primary expression of associations using a random effects model. In case of high heterogeneity, we calculated a 95% prediction interval. We used the CHARMS (Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies) checklist for risk of bias assessment. We included 27 studies with a total of 2 978 659 unique participants among 20 cohorts with mean age ranging from 42 to 76 years. We identified 21 risk models used for incident AF risk in community cohorts. Three models showed significant summary discrimination despite high heterogeneity: CHARGE-AF (Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology) [summary C-statistic 0.71; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.66–0.76], FHS-AF (Framingham Heart Study risk score for AF) (summary C-statistic 0.70; 95% CI 0.64–0.76), and CHA2DS2-VASc (summary C-statistic 0.69; 95% CI 0.64–0.74). Of these, CHARGE-AF and FHS-AF had originally been derived for AF incidence prediction. Only CHARGE-AF, which comprises easily obtainable measurements and medical history elements, showed significant summary discrimination among cohorts that had applied a uniform (5-year) risk prediction window. Conclusion CHARGE-AF appeared most suitable for primary screening purposes in terms of performance and applicability in older community cohorts of predominantly European descent.

Funder

Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development

European Research Council

European Union’s Horizon 2020

German Center for Cardiovascular Research

Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research

NWO

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference65 articles.

1. Global burden of atrial fibrillation in developed and developing nations;Chugh;Glob Heart,2014

2. Sex differences and similarities in atrial fibrillation epidemiology, risk factors, and mortality in community cohorts: results from the BiomarCaRE Consortium (Biomarker for Cardiovascular Risk Assessment in Europe);Magnussen;Circulation,2017

3. 50 year trends in atrial fibrillation prevalence, incidence, risk factors, and mortality in the Framingham Heart Study: a cohort study;Schnabel;Lancet,2015

4. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study;Wolf;Stroke,1991

5. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS;Kirchhof;Europace,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3