Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Author:

Ditac Geoffroy1ORCID,Cottinet Pierre-Jean2ORCID,Quyen Le Minh2ORCID,Grinberg Daniel34ORCID,Duchateau Josselin5ORCID,Gardey Kévin1ORCID,Dulac Arnaud1ORCID,Delinière Antoine14ORCID,Haddad Christelle1ORCID,Boussuge-Roze Julie5ORCID,Sacher Frédéric5ORCID,Jaïs Pierre5ORCID,Chevalier Philippe14ORCID,Bessière Francis14ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Electrophysiology, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon , 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron , France

2. INSA-Lyon, LGEF, Université de Lyon , 20 Av. Albert Einstein, 69100 Villeurbanne , France

3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, Hospices Civils de Lyon , 28 avenue du Doyen Lepine, 69500 Bron , France

4. Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est , 8 avenue Rockefeller, 69003 Lyon , France

5. Department of electrophysiology, CHU Bordeaux, Université de Bordeaux , IHU LIRYC, Av. du Haut Lévêque, 33600 Pessac , France

Abstract

Abstract Aims Climate change represents the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. Health care system is itself a large contributor to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In cardiology, atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation is an increasing activity using numerous non-reusable materials that could contribute to GHG emission. Determining a detailed carbon footprint analysis of an AF catheter ablation procedure allows the identification of the main polluting sources that give opportunities for reduction of environmental impact. To assess the carbon footprint of AF catheter ablation procedure. To determine priority actions to decrease pollution. Methods and results An eco-audit method used to predict the GHG emission of an AF catheter ablation procedure was investigated. Two workstations were considered including surgery and anaesthesia. In the operating room, every waste produced by single-use medical devices, pharmaceutical drugs, and energy consumption during intervention were evaluated. All analyses were limited to the operating room. Thirty procedures were analysed over a period of 8 weeks: 18 pulmonary veins isolation RF ablations, 7 complex RF procedures including PVI, roof and mitral isthmus lines, ethanol infusion of the Marshall vein and cavo tricuspid isthmus line, and 5 pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon. The mean emission during AF catheter ablation procedures was 76.9 kg of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e). The operating field accounted for 75.4% of the carbon footprint, while only 24.6% for the anaesthesia workstation. On one hand, material production and manufacturing were the most polluting phases of product life cycle which, respectively, represented 71.3% (54.8 kg of CO2-e) and 17.0% (13.1 kg of CO2-e) of total pollution. On the other hand, transport contributed in 10.6% (8.1 kg of CO2-e), while product use resulted in 1.1% (0.9 kg of CO2-e) of GHG production. Electrophysiology catheters were demonstrated to be the main contributors of environmental impact with 29.9 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 38.8%). Three dimensional mapping system and electrocardiogram patches were accounting for 6.8 kg of CO2-e (i.e. 8.8% of total). Conclusion AF catheter ablation involves a mean of 76.9 kg of CO2-e. With an estimated 600 000 annual worldwide procedures, the environmental impact of AF catheter ablation activity is estimated equal to 125 tons of CO2 emission each day. It represents an equivalent of 700 000 km of car ride every day. Electrophysiology catheters and patches are the main contributors of the carbon footprint. The focus must be on reducing, reusing, and recycling these items to limit the impact of AF ablation on the environment. A road map of steps to implement in different time frames is proposed.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. International comparison of health care carbon footprints;Pichler;Environ Res Lett,2019

2. The 2019 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change: ensuring that the health of a child born today is not defined by a changing climate;Watts;Lancet,2019

3. Health care’s climate footprint: the health sector contribution and opportunities for action;Karliner;Eur J Public Health,2020

4. Eco-audit of conventional heart surgery procedures;Grinberg;Eur J Cardiothorac Surg,2021

5. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association.;Virani;Circulation,2021

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3