Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices and abandoned or epicardial leads: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Meier Claudia12ORCID,Israel Carsten3,Eisenblätter Michel24ORCID,Hoyer Annika25ORCID,Stoye Ferdinand Valentin25ORCID,Yilmaz Ali6,Gielen Stephan12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Campus Klinikum Lippe, Universitätsklinikum Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Universitätsklinik für Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin , Röntgenstraße 18, 32756 Detmold , Germany

2. Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Bielefeld , Postfach 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld , Germany

3. Klinik für Innere Medizin, Kardiologie, Nephrologie und Diabetologie, Evangelisches Klinikum Bethel , Bielefeld , Germany

4. Campus Klinikum Lippe, Universitätsklinikum Ostwestfalen-Lippe, Universitätsinstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie , Detmold , Germany

5. Institut für Biostatistik und Medizinische Biometrie, Universität Bielefeld , Bielefeld , Germany

6. Herz-MRT-Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum Münster , Münster , Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aims Persistent reluctance to perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with abandoned and/or epicardial leads of cardiac implantable electronic devices is related to in vitro studies reporting tip heating. While there is a plethora of data on the safety of MRI in conditional and non-conditional implantable devices, there is a clear lack of safety data in patients with abandoned and/or epicardial leads. Methods and results Relevant literature was identified in Medline and CINAHL using the key terms ‘magnetic resonance imaging’ AND ‘abandoned leads’ OR ‘epicardial leads’. Secondary literature and cross-references were supplemented. For reporting guidance, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 was used. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) registration number 465530. Twenty-one publications with a total of 656 patients with 854 abandoned and/or epicardial leads and 929 MRI scans of different anatomical regions were included. No scan-related major adverse cardiac event was documented, although the possibility of under-reporting of critical events in the literature should be considered. Furthermore, no severe device dysfunction or severe arrhythmia was reported. Mainly transient lead parameter changes were observed in 2.8% in the subgroup of patients with functional epicardial leads. As a possible correlate of myocardial affection, subjective sensations occurred mainly in the subgroup with abandoned epicardial leads (4.0%), but no change in myocardial biomarkers was observed. Conclusion Existing publications did not report any relevant adverse events for MRI in patients with abandoned and/or epicardial leads if performed according to strict safety guidelines. However, a more rigorous risk–benefit calculation should be made for patients with epicardial leads.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3