Q waves are the strongest electrocardiographic variable associated with primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator benefit: a prospective multicentre study

Author:

Pelli Ari1,Junttila M Juhani12ORCID,Kenttä Tuomas V1,Schlögl Simon3,Zabel Markus34,Malik Marek56,Reichlin Tobias7ORCID,Willems Rik8ORCID,Vos Marc A9,Harden Markus10ORCID,Friede Tim410ORCID,Sticherling Christian7ORCID,Huikuri Heikki V1

Affiliation:

1. Research Unit of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Center Oulu, Oulu University Hospital and University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland

2. Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

3. Division of Cardiology, University Medical Center Göttingen Heart Center, Göttingen, Germany

4. DZHK (German Center for Cardiovascular Research), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

5. National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK

6. Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic

7. Division of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

8. Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leuven and University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

9. Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

10. Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aim The association of standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) markers with benefits of the primary prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has not been determined in the contemporary era. We analysed traditional and novel ECG variables in a large prospective, controlled primary prophylactic ICD population to assess the predictive value of ECG in terms of ICD benefit. Methods and results Electrocardiograms from 1477 ICD patients and 700 control patients (EU-CERT-ICD; non-randomized, controlled, prospective multicentre study; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02064192), who met ICD implantation criteria but did not receive the device, were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. In ICD patients, the co-primary outcome of first appropriate shock was used. Mean follow-up time was 2.4 ± 1.1 years to death and 2.3 ± 1.2 years to the first appropriate shock. Pathological Q waves were associated with decreased mortality in ICD patients [hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35–0.84; P < 0.01] and patients with pathological Q waves had significantly more benefit from ICD (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.21–0.93; P = 0.03). QTc interval increase taken as a continuous variable was associated with both mortality and appropriate shock incidence, but commonly used cut-off values, were not statistically significantly associated with either of the outcomes. Conclusion Pathological Q waves were a strong ECG predictor of ICD benefit in primary prophylactic ICD patients. Excess mortality among Q wave patients seems to be due to arrhythmic death which can be prevented by ICD.

Funder

European Community’s 7th Framework Programme

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3