The V6-V1 interpeak interval: a novel criterion for the diagnosis of left bundle branch capture

Author:

Jastrzębski Marek1,Burri Haran2ORCID,Kiełbasa Grzegorz1,Curila Karol3,Moskal Paweł1,Bednarek Agnieszka1,Rajzer Marek1,Vijayaraman Pugazhendhi4

Affiliation:

1. First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland

2. Cardiac Pacing Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

3. Department of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic

4. Geisinger Heart Institute, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Wilkes-Barre, PA, USA

Abstract

Abstract Aims We hypothesized that during left bundle branch (LBB) area pacing, the various possible combinations of direct capture/non-capture of the septal myocardium and the LBB result in distinct patterns of right and left ventricular activation. This could translate into different combinations of R-wave peak time (RWPT) in V1 and V6. Consequently, the V6-V1 interpeak interval could differentiate the three types of LBB area capture: non-selective (ns-)LBB, selective (s-)LBB, and left ventricular septal (LVS). Methods and results Patients with unquestionable evidence of LBB capture were included. The V6-V1 interpeak interval, V6RWPT, and V1RWPT were compared between different types of LBB area capture. A total of 468 patients from two centres were screened, with 124 patients (239 electrocardiograms) included in the analysis. Loss of LVS capture resulted in an increase in V1RWPT by ≥15 ms but did not impact V6RWPT. Loss of LBB capture resulted in an increase in V6RWPT by ≥15 ms but only minimally influenced V1RWPT. Consequently, the V6-V1 interval was longest during s-LBB capture (62.3 ± 21.4 ms), intermediate during ns-LBB capture (41.3 ± 14.0 ms), and shortest during LVS capture (26.5 ± 8.6 ms). The optimal value of the V6-V1 interval value for the differentiation between ns-LBB and LVS capture was 33 ms (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84.7%). A specificity of 100% for the diagnosis of LBB capture was obtained with a cut-off value of >44 ms. Conclusion The V6-V1 interpeak interval is a promising novel criterion for the diagnosis of LBB area capture.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physiology (medical),Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Reference8 articles.

1. Electrocardiographic analysis for His bundle pacing at implantation and follow-up;Burri;JACC Clin Electrophysiol,2020

2. Electrocardiographic characterization of non-selective His-bundle pacing: validation of novel diagnostic criteria;Jastrzębski;Europace,2019

3. A beginner's guide to permanent left bundle branch pacing;Huang;Heart Rhythm,2019

4. Prospective evaluation of feasibility and electrophysiologic and echocardiographic characteristics of left bundle branch area pacing;Vijayaraman;Heart Rhythm,2019

5. Left bundle branch area pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: results from the international LBBP Collaborative Study Group;Vijayaraman;J Am Coll Cardiol,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3