Performance and safety of temperature- and flow-controlled radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmia

Abstract

Abstract Aims High-power ablation is effective for ventricular arrhythmia ablation; however, it increases the risk of steam pops. The aim of this study was to define the safety and efficacy of QMODE ablation in the ventricle and the risk of steam pop. Methods and results Consecutive patients undergoing ventricular ablation using QDOT were included in a prospective single-centre registry. Procedural data, complications, and follow-up were systematically analysed and compared with a historical ventricular tachycardia (VT) and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) cohort ablated using STSF. QMODE (≤50 W) ablation was performed in 107 patients [age 62 ± 13 years; 76% male; VT (n = 41); PVC (n = 66)]. A total of 2456 applications were analysed [power: 45.9 ± 5.0 W with minimal power titration (90% > 95% max power); duration 26 ± 8 s; impedance drop 9.4 ± 4.7 Ω; ablation index: 569 ± 163; mean–max temperature 44.3 ± 2.6°C]. Ventricular tachycardia ablation was associated with shorter radiofrequency (RF) time and a trend towards shorter procedure times using QDOT (QDOT vs. STSF: 20.1 ± 14.7 vs. 31 ± 17 min; P = 0.002, 151 ± 59 vs. 172 ± 48 min; P = 0.06). Complications, VT recurrence, and mortality rates were comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 2% vs. 2%; P = 0.9, 24% vs. 27%; P = 0.82, and 2% vs. 4%; P = 0.67). Five audible steam pops (0.02%) occurred. Premature ventricular complex ablation was associated with comparable RF and procedure times (QDOT vs. STSF: 4.8 ± 4.6 vs. 3.9 ± 3.1 min; P = 0.25 and 96.1 ± 31.9 vs. 94.6 ± 24.7 min; P = 0.75). Complication and PVC recurrence were also comparable (QDOT vs. STSF: 0% vs. 3%; P = 0.17 and 19% vs. 22%; P = 0.71). Conclusion Ventricular ablation using QMODE ≤ 50 W is safe and effective for both VT and PVC ablation and is associated with a low risk for steam pop.